Fastmail's iOS client on mobile, and their browser client on desktop.
I de-Google'd my life and Fastmail is amazing. I use their own clients because I'm creating new mail filters to sort my incoming email just often enough that I miss not being able to do that when using other clients.
Thunderbird, mainly because it is more accessible even than the web clients and because I don't need to remember different key bindings for different email providers.
It's not the latest type of pretty, though. It's very important that every few years you throw out all usability/accessibility to replace the user interface with one that is the latest kind of pretty, then if you feel like it, slowly add back usability/accessibility features until the cycle repeats.
mmm, the classic theme is available for whoever wants it, but I'm blind and my usual hot keys work as before. I'd like better search and better calendar, but the rest is pretty fine. The new gmail ui sucks and roundqube sucks even more, so tb it is.
Thunderbird on my Debian desktop, BlueMail on Android.
Thunderbird gives me the irrites because of it's mbox storage format isn't robust. That's because isn't journaled, and POSIX append to file isn't reliable. It doubly irritating because their is robust alternative: maildir. Also it's google calendar plugin doesn't work if someone shares an invite with you. But on the positive side it's IMAP so losing local data isn't a disaster, and everything else about it is better than the proprietary alternatives.
BlueMail's nit is it isn't open source. Everything else is literally perfect. It's more capable the GMail or Outlook for example, which amazes me. I don't understand how / why they make it available for free, in fact it's downright suspicious, given it's so good I'd pay for it if there was a way. Still, I'd abandon it for an open source alternative if they did basic stuff like support subfolders. FairEmail doesn't. k9 was worse when I tried it.
13 comments
[ 3.3 ms ] story [ 40.9 ms ] threadI de-Google'd my life and Fastmail is amazing. I use their own clients because I'm creating new mail filters to sort my incoming email just often enough that I miss not being able to do that when using other clients.
Written in bash, python, and AWK.
About 2% to 5% of the time I use a webmail client, usually Roundcube.
At work, it's just mail.google.com.
I'm sure that's a pretty standard workflow.
Thunderbird gives me the irrites because of it's mbox storage format isn't robust. That's because isn't journaled, and POSIX append to file isn't reliable. It doubly irritating because their is robust alternative: maildir. Also it's google calendar plugin doesn't work if someone shares an invite with you. But on the positive side it's IMAP so losing local data isn't a disaster, and everything else about it is better than the proprietary alternatives.
BlueMail's nit is it isn't open source. Everything else is literally perfect. It's more capable the GMail or Outlook for example, which amazes me. I don't understand how / why they make it available for free, in fact it's downright suspicious, given it's so good I'd pay for it if there was a way. Still, I'd abandon it for an open source alternative if they did basic stuff like support subfolders. FairEmail doesn't. k9 was worse when I tried it.