HN Explorer

Are the Best Shunning AI?

3 points by ilrwbwrkhv ↗ HN
Anecdotally, I have been finding those who are producting original, high quality art, music, movies, games, software etc are all super opposed to AI.

Is this something everyone is noticing?

Are there some well known folks who are producing things using AI?

5 comments

[ 3.7 ms ] story [ 23.4 ms ] thread
falcor84
I haven't noticed that myself. An easy counter-example is Terry Tao - e.g. in this interview https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/ai-will-become-ma...
ilrwbwrkhv
It's not a counter example though. From that interview:

> I think in three years AI will become useful for mathematicians. It will be a great co-pilot. You’re trying to prove a theorem, and there’s one step that you think is true, but you can’t quite see how it’s true. And you can say, “AI, can you do this stuff for me?” And it may say, “I think I can prove this.”

> It’s a very exciting potential use of AI to create connections or at least point out possible connections. Right now it has a very lousy success rate. It might give you 10 suggestions of which one is interesting and nine are rubbish. It’s actually almost worse than random. But this could change in the future.

As usual the title is embellished and his actual interview is it "might" be useful.

spiderfarmer
AI levels the playing field and gives ordinary people superpowers, even if it gets them to 70%, real pros don’t stand out as much as they used to. That’s a hard pill for some to swallow. Yes, they will stay ahead of the pack in many areas and will rightfully look down upon middle of the road AI assisted works, but the fact that everyone else can now at least level up is a big part of their resentment.
[deleted]
(comment deleted)
gregjor
I can only comment on my own field, programming. AI can write code at a junior level, and sometimes help explain and debug.

The hard part of programming—the expertise that comes from experience—happens when gathering and defining requirements. Writing code takes skill but got more automated over time, from compilers to IDEs to LLMs.

Getting to “almost working” with AI coding looks impressive, but like a car missing only one wheel it has zero utility. AI coding looks impressive to people who could not write code at all. It seems less impressive to those who can.

I won’t call it useless but at this point the time spent chasing down hallucinated library functions and API endpoints, and auditing code for security problems and missing edge cases more than offsets any benefit for experienced programmers. Maybe it will get better over time.