36 comments

[ 4.6 ms ] story [ 89.6 ms ] thread
Hey, I live in Puerto Escondido.
what have you heard?
Non-Mexican tourists aren't targeted, so it's not really part of their world.

Versus that time a few years ago where two Mexican girls were on a night mangrove boat trip near Puerto Escondido, left the boat to go swimming, and were attacked by crocodiles. Something like that does hit the gossip circle among tourists because those crocs do target tourists.

For example, the group of people in TFA were from Tlaxcala, a big human trafficking center. Who knows what they were involved in. Maybe they escaped from something or were involved some other way.

It's kinda like those burial grounds that are all over Mexican news. The people who were killed there were local Mexicans recruited for fake job ads by narcos and then forced into being hitmen and things like that. It's not something that you should be worried about when you plan a week trip in Guadalajara.

I've heard that parts are basically all ex-pats; non-Mexican.

I was astonished to chat to someone who lived there and remote worked for an Australian company. Curious to me!

> I've heard that parts are basically all ex-pats

No, not in Puerto Escondido.

It's hard to get real info as an outsider since everyone has a motivated reason to say things like that about everywhere. Tourists like to try to sound well traveled by pretending a place is beneath them because they weren't the only tourist in a beach club that they walked into that was playing Journey on the sound system and then scoff like they took a wrong turn and meant to go to some run down reggaeton club on the poorer side of town.

Everyone wants to be the last person allowed somewhere, and when they're not, they just complain about how much better things were N years ago. It's like listening to someone sitting in traffic complain about traffic without realizing they are the traffic.

But, one of the things about Puerto is that it's a tourist destination for Mexicans. They even just finished a huge highway that skyrocketed Mexican tourism to the place. I've been here on and off starting 10 years ago, so I've been talking about finding the "next Puerto" for a while now, but this place is hard to beat for surfing.

You might enjoy The Beach by Alex Garland if you haven't already read it.
The article kind of brushes over - 10 or so of the victims are all from the same place but were in puerto Escondido when they disappeared? And bodies were dropped just outside of the state line, which was effective somehow? Seems quite odd.
An earlier article gives a bit of detail about finding the survivor. I can find no statement from her, tho.

    On Monday, attention shifted back to Puebla. Brenda Mariel Salas was found alive there, according to the Oaxaca Prosecutor’s Office, which did not explain when she had been found, nor in what condition, nor how she had arrived there, hundreds of kilometers from where she had been with her friend Angie. Brenda was found alone. 
ref: https://english.elpais.com/international/2025-03-05/disappea...
Indeed. Total mystery, and btw we didn't bother to ask the one survivor what happened. Weird.
it's right there in first paragraph:

> authorities have acknowledged that they are investigating possible involvement by the police

If it's true, or even if there is a non-zero probability of this, I would not expect official organization like "Oaxaca Prosecutor’s Office" to admit this easily.

El Salvador showed you the way. Mexico is 5 years from lasting peace if the appropriate measures are taken.
In El Salvador the army/police were better equipped enough to lock up the gangs; in Mexico it's not clear whether the army is powerful enough to defeat the cartels even if it seriously tried to.
Better equipped, as in with a government that wanted the gangs eradicated?
I wonder what would happen if the US got involved in a war against the Mexican cartels. Is that feasible, if even desirable?
great, Afghanistan, but this time in Texas
Yeah, but this time the cartels are the invading force and they are facing off against trigger happy Texans. Don't think there's many parallels, here.
You seem to be implying that the El Salvador project of brutal mass incarceration without spending too much effort checking that the incarcerated really are guilty could solve this problem too.

Firstly, it probably wouldn't because that program only began a long time after the majority of the improvement had already happened: https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_848,c_limit,f_webp,q_a... Bukele only began the mass incarceration after El Salvador had roughly the same number of homicides per person as the USA.

Secondly even if it really had been that program that produced the improvements, the gangs in El Salvador were very different to the gangs in Mexico. I found https://mattlakeman.org/2024/03/30/notes-on-el-salvador/ interesting for background on the gangs.

You get an A on your paper, but your country is broken forever.
Countries with strong protections for individual rights score disproportionately well in quality of life metrics and crime statistics. I don't think that's a coincidence.
> The justification is that if they were taken away, they were surely up to something: that if they were killed, they must have done something.

Occam's Razor would suggest that if 9 people are kidnapped simultaneously, murdered and transported across state lines to complicate the resulting investigation, it's pretty likely that the cartels are involved and they were targeted for a reason, as opposed to being the work of (say) an extremely efficient random solo mass murderer.

Of course, it doesn't mean they personally did anything, the cartels can and do regularly kidnap and murder relatives, people in the wrong place at the wrong time etc just to send a message.

Mexico... must be absolutely lovely country to visit, but due to gangs 'activities' its a no-go for me and my family, or myself alone. I don't mind backpacking semi-safe 3rd world countries alone where I stick like a sore thumb in any crowd, but this is next level(s) of unsafe.

We have few friends who go there (not specifically here) even with kids, mostly due to low costs, stating all is fine and beheadings are happening 100/200km further away but I can't even begin to explain how stupid such argument is. To each their own.

Mexico City is safe and a wonderful place to visit - if, like me, you like big cities.
It really depends which state you go to. Also, statistically speaking, probably riskier to drive your car compared to visiting Mexico City for vacation; that said, insecurity is bad and needs to be fixed.
State? Insecurity in a safe city? I don’t understand your comment.
I moved to Mexico City from San Francisco. CDMX is cleaners and safer than Mission Bay in SF!
I stayed in the wonderful hotel while on a layover in Houston. I just didn't feel like roaming the streets, it didn't feel safe. Flew to Monterrey Mexico the next day. No school shootings!
The funny part about this is I travelled all over Mexico and most locals told me that they are scared to travel to the US because there's a high chance they'll be shot. Call it personal experience, but I've felt MUCH safer in CDMX than in any major US city.
CDMX feels pretty safe, it’s the more rural areas you need to be cautious. It’s essentially inverted in the US.
Huatulco was a beautiful and safe place, many burnt out American kids found or lost themselves there. The cartels were not active in this area and the military had many checkpoints on the highways. Zipolite was sort of how you’d imagine California in the 60’s, people nude, openly smoking bongs, public showers available to all for pocket change. Affordable hostels, enlightening evenings.

I am sorry to hear of this shift. At one time, the original population of Mexicans was forcibly moved to government land which is arranged in a grid pattern, our guide lived in sector “U2” for example. You can see the grid where the local people live in google maps.

Is there anywhere like this in North America or has time and culture changed the possibility of this experience.
I have been there, in Puerto Escondido several times. We even had a wedding there a few years ago. But yes, 2 years ago was the last time I took a trip from Colorado all the way to Puerto Escondido and back (staying there with wife and dogs for about 2 months). Oaxaca never been an issue (other than dengue), but the states we had to drive through. Cartel activities were brutal that year. Even if you were precocious and staying on major highways - not safe anymore. During that travel the worst thing have happened to us were cops stopping us for no reason (US Plates + Big Motorhome), but the the most scary thing that happened to us was to know that 50 kilometers down the road of where we stopped for a night there were cartel activities on the highway, stopping foreigners and taking them out of the cars (machine guns, etc). We were lucky.

As far as traveling by air to the known locations. Keep in mind, that a LOT of tourist just don't take it seriously, the simple rules "don't buy drugs offered on street", "don't follow people into weird dark alleys", "don't be alone", "don't get drunk and wonder in the streets at night". Those will get you in trouble here in US, in any other country, and Mexico is not going to be an exception. Even two years ago we have heard some stories about being robbed on the street, and the question was "how did it happen?" - looking for drugs in the middle of the night, already being drunk. Sure, those cases might be different.