https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ytterby ("Ytterby is the single richest source of elemental discoveries in the world; the chemical elements yttrium (Y), terbium (Tb), erbium (Er), and ytterbium (Yb) are all named after Ytterby")
You could *almost* squeeze in a seventh, as Holmium is named after the city of Stockholm; and the city Ytterby is in the greater Stockholm area, in Sweden. Sadly, Ytterby doesn't seem to be contained in any political division with a proper name containing "Stockholm". So, that doesn't work. (Though Ytterby is in a geographic region called the "Stockholm archipelago").
Except all of the elements in the address above were at least partially discovered at that address or by teams with connections to that lab. Although usually it is a joint discovery with at least one other lab.
In my childhood in New Zealand I remember berk used to mean plonker/fool.
Wiktionary says:
berk (UK, Ireland, Commonwealth) a fool, a prat, a twit, etc. Although the term remains in fairly wide use, its specific origin and meaning in rhyming slang is less well known, lessening its vulgarity. Synonyms see fool and idiot.
Interesting! I enjoy local vernacular. But the way I read your original message was more like declaring a midwest generalized usage, which may not have been your intent.
Reminds me of a scene from the Royle Family (British show) where Anthony is managing a new band. When asked the name of the band he responds "Exit. That way, wherever we play, the name is always up in lights"
It's a confusing name to me though. Berkelocene feels like something geologists and anthropologists should know about, marked by a layer of sediment comprised mostly of hemp, LSD blotters, and decomposing concert posters.
This sounds like it would merit inclusion in Derek Lowe's "Things I won't work with":
“Only a few facilities around the world can protect both the compound and the worker while managing the combined hazards of a highly radioactive material that reacts vigorously with the oxygen and moisture in air,” said Polly Arnold, a co-corresponding author on the paper.
A solid kilogram of it would be a lot of decays in a small area. It would heat up close to its melting point before glowing brightly enough in infrared to shed the heat as quickly as it's generated.
Probably not that long, uranocene (a comparatively heavy molecule of similar structure) apparently has an appreciable vapor pressure of 10^-3 torr or so at 200C.
Weight does matter of course, but intermolecular bonding/affinity is generally the more important consideration.
> Probably not that long, uranocene (a comparatively heavy molecule of similar structure) apparently has an appreciable vapor pressure of 10^-3 torr or so at 200C.
200°C(392°F) is hotter than boiling cooking oil (it's a hot oven to cook, but far from red hot)
vapor pressure of water at 0°C(32°F) is 5 torr
i.e. almost frozen water has 5000x the vapor pressure of very hot uranocele.
Let's replace "forever" with "extremely slowly".
> Weight does matter of course, but intermolecular bonding/affinity is generally the more important consideration.
I agree, so I choose a non-polar material to compare. (i.e. petrol instead of water). Probably petrol and parafin are very saturated and linear, and both change the properties of the molecules a lot. I'd better have choose something with more double bounds, but I don't have a very good example at hand.
That one has cosmic significance (so I understand); that island is what choked off big bang nucleosynthesis from continuing beyond helium. The universe would be unrecognizable if there were a stable He-5 or Li-5.
49 comments
[ 4.3 ms ] story [ 114 ms ] threadBut I have to say, as a speaker of a post-colonial English dialect with strong British English roots...
...calling the element berkelium is either very innocent Berkley pride, or they knew what they were doing...
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/berk
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ytterby ("Ytterby is the single richest source of elemental discoveries in the world; the chemical elements yttrium (Y), terbium (Tb), erbium (Er), and ytterbium (Yb) are all named after Ytterby")
Eu
You could *almost* squeeze in a seventh, as Holmium is named after the city of Stockholm; and the city Ytterby is in the greater Stockholm area, in Sweden. Sadly, Ytterby doesn't seem to be contained in any political division with a proper name containing "Stockholm". So, that doesn't work. (Though Ytterby is in a geographic region called the "Stockholm archipelago").
Na is a bit older than those labs.
Berkeley Lawrence elements: https://www2.lbl.gov/Science-Articles/Archive/new-elements-h...
Lawrence Livermore elements: https://www.llnl.gov/article/41866/lawrence-livermore-credit...
Berkeley Hunt => C..
My grandmother used to use it all the time; she'd be horrified. Its meaning has diverged significantly from its origin.
I'd say at least the ~70M population of the uk would know it. Probably quite a few outside also
Wiktionary says:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burke_and_Wills_expedition
I never really understood why, but now that I understand it's rhyming slang I'm even more confused as to why we did that.
As for why, because I've never heard the term and am also from the area.
“Only a few facilities around the world can protect both the compound and the worker while managing the combined hazards of a highly radioactive material that reacts vigorously with the oxygen and moisture in air,” said Polly Arnold, a co-corresponding author on the paper.
A solid kilogram of it would be a lot of decays in a small area. It would heat up close to its melting point before glowing brightly enough in infrared to shed the heat as quickly as it's generated.
It's a very heavy molecule.
The top "bread" of the sandwich has 14 Carbons and a few undraw Hydrogen, I guess 16. So the weight is 12×14+16×1 =184
Double that for the other "bread".
The "meatball" in the center is Berkelium 247.
So the total weight is 184+184+247=615.
Assuming the Berkelium is totaly covered, the exterior part is similar to Hydrocarbons in oil. There are many, so let's try to pick the correct one.
Each Carbon usually has two Hydrogen, so the weight is 14×num_C, so the number of Carbons in a fake equivalent is 615/14~=44.
Hydrocarbons in gasoline have like 6-10 Carbons, diesel has like 12-20. Parafin wax https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paraffin_wax has 20-40 Carbons per molecule.
So this molecule is closer to heavy parafin wax.
Double bonds are also important, and this molecule has a lot of them, but my handwaving is not strong enough to deal with it.
> How fast does it evaporate in a vacuum?
I guess it will take forever.
[1] Edit: without a sample, you can probably measure it in the lab with a big enough sample.
Weight does matter of course, but intermolecular bonding/affinity is generally the more important consideration.
> Probably not that long, uranocene (a comparatively heavy molecule of similar structure) apparently has an appreciable vapor pressure of 10^-3 torr or so at 200C.
200°C(392°F) is hotter than boiling cooking oil (it's a hot oven to cook, but far from red hot)
vapor pressure of water at 0°C(32°F) is 5 torr
i.e. almost frozen water has 5000x the vapor pressure of very hot uranocele.
Let's replace "forever" with "extremely slowly".
> Weight does matter of course, but intermolecular bonding/affinity is generally the more important consideration.
I agree, so I choose a non-polar material to compare. (i.e. petrol instead of water). Probably petrol and parafin are very saturated and linear, and both change the properties of the molecules a lot. I'd better have choose something with more double bounds, but I don't have a very good example at hand.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Island_of_stability#/media/F...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bang_nucleosynthesis#Heavy... ("Big Bang nucleosynthesis produced very few nuclei of elements heavier than lithium due to a bottleneck: the absence of a stable nucleus with 8 or 5 nucleons...")
VCs talk about deep tech and then they don't jump on stuff like this!