[–] wodenokoto 1y ago ↗ Anyone been running this? Sounds like a major overhaul. Is this something one should stay away from in a greenfield project because documentation is maybe not even ready? [–] thenaturalist 1y ago ↗ Not 3.0 yet, but Airflow is a very, very mature project I'd say.It was released Oct. 2014, joined Apache Foundation in 2016, became a top level project in 2019.Check the release notes/ blog post and you'll see the amount of people involved.In this release, some, but not all features are genuinely new without past dependencies, but I didn't spot major breaking changes.I'd confidently go ahead, esp. in greenfield.Might be a bit more muddy to migrate from 2.X to 3 atm.
[–] thenaturalist 1y ago ↗ Not 3.0 yet, but Airflow is a very, very mature project I'd say.It was released Oct. 2014, joined Apache Foundation in 2016, became a top level project in 2019.Check the release notes/ blog post and you'll see the amount of people involved.In this release, some, but not all features are genuinely new without past dependencies, but I didn't spot major breaking changes.I'd confidently go ahead, esp. in greenfield.Might be a bit more muddy to migrate from 2.X to 3 atm.
3 comments
[ 2.4 ms ] story [ 15.3 ms ] threadIt was released Oct. 2014, joined Apache Foundation in 2016, became a top level project in 2019.
Check the release notes/ blog post and you'll see the amount of people involved.
In this release, some, but not all features are genuinely new without past dependencies, but I didn't spot major breaking changes.
I'd confidently go ahead, esp. in greenfield.
Might be a bit more muddy to migrate from 2.X to 3 atm.