Yeah, the favicon they used starting around 2009[1] was definitely my favorite visually. It stood out among a ton of tabs; the monolithic favicons they've been using since they just look like blobs to my eye. This latest one is especially bad in that regard.
To me, that new 'blue pill' one is better, more subdued, and the 'g' is very legible. Before that that was just a patchwork of colors and the 'g' was unreadable on a white background (i.e Chrome's own location field). The original entry by André Resende was much, much better than the messy one they used since 2009. The capital G was nice.
I did not downvote you but I can understand it, something changed on one of the most known pages in the world, one which also happens to be extremely minimalistic making any change probably newsworthy. Also, favicons are a little bit like a logo for a company, people will see that icon on their browsers all the time. I'd say it is interesting enough to have been submitted to this community.
I did not downvote you either, but I think branding is a concept that is pretty important to most of us. How the major companies handle the evolution of their brand is pretty interesting, especially the subtle aspects that we see every day but might not think about.
I've actually been getting better content from /r/programming than HN for a while now, but that's not great either. Do you know of anywhere else to go?
20 comments
[ 5.0 ms ] story [ 59.1 ms ] threadhttp://blogoscoped.com/archive/2008-05-30-n48.html
[1] http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/01/googles-new-favicon.h...
The icon itself's not even new -- the post mentions it's the same icon they've been using on the mobile devices already.
Really, all the post is saying is: "Lookie, we're using our mobile icon everywhere for the sake of consistency."
Does that really "gratifies one's intellectual curiosity"?
http://ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html