Personally I didnt care that much to have looked too in depth to the claims. The most advanced military's battle plans could have been broadcast widely weeks in advance to the houthis and they'd still lose.
> most advanced military's battle plans could have been broadcast widely weeks in advance to the houthis and they'd still lose
I have an undergraduate aerospace background. I could find a firing solution to those jets given public data about carrier deployments and the specific take-off times (when jets are low and slow—very vulnerable). If those chats had been public for weeks, the Houthis would have scored a hit.
10 comments
[ 2.4 ms ] story [ 37.6 ms ] threadI guess Signal wasn't vulnerable to a 0day afterall.
Was this really debated somewhere? Even the White House didn’t bother denying it.
Personally I didnt care that much to have looked too in depth to the claims. The most advanced military's battle plans could have been broadcast widely weeks in advance to the houthis and they'd still lose.
I have an undergraduate aerospace background. I could find a firing solution to those jets given public data about carrier deployments and the specific take-off times (when jets are low and slow—very vulnerable). If those chats had been public for weeks, the Houthis would have scored a hit.
>Waltz hired aides that his critics said didn’t appeal to Trump’s MAGA base
What even is this thing?
It's all MEGA loyalty litmus tests now rather than competency as a requirement.
You’re mixing up Hegseth and Waltz.