If you ask random people to draw a horse, they will give you excuses why they can't draw. Tell them to draw horse using only rectangles and suddenly everybody is a painter.
Remember when this idea bred those fake minimalist preachers? Mistaking constraint-based design for asceticism?
Too much constraints, you end up in a corner.
It reminds me of Windows Metro. That was good constraint-based design. Lots of clever thinking in the good direction. Windows 8 was great (hey, Apple copied some of it, the highest form of praise).
Eames was smart. Translating those things to tech is often a challenge. Keeping the thing human is difficult.
> Charles Eames’s distinction between forced compromises and willingly accepted constraints reveals a profound truth — in the delicate balance between structure and freedom lies the sweet spot where creativity thrives.
Suggested constraint: "write this post without AI".
10 comments
[ 2.9 ms ] story [ 28.2 ms ] threadToo much constraints, you end up in a corner.
It reminds me of Windows Metro. That was good constraint-based design. Lots of clever thinking in the good direction. Windows 8 was great (hey, Apple copied some of it, the highest form of praise).
Eames was smart. Translating those things to tech is often a challenge. Keeping the thing human is difficult.
Suggested constraint: "write this post without AI".
IMHO it should be required reading for all programmers and designers.
Design your own constraints and see your creativity flourish.
My favorite is time: what can I accomplish in the next 20 minutes?