It's a neat idea. It'll be a lot of work to get right. In the meantime, I can send a psd, png, whatever to cssilize and have it chopped up by a human into great looking html and images and I don't have to piece-meal the psd myself to conform to what markupwand needs:
I would never do this for a website or web app, but if they could make it code emails that work in every email client I would use it immediately. I don't care how shitty the code looks.
I don't understand how people are still designing for the web in an image manipulation application. There are so many other tools out there today to get you to a design much quicker than Photoshop.
Photoshop and Fireworks are great and I don't see many designers abandoning desktop software entirely. But I think there are plenty of tools that can help you get into the browser more quickly.
18 comments
[ 26.9 ms ] story [ 875 ms ] threadhttp://www.cssilize.com
It's like $35 or something per page.
http://www.markupwand.com/signup
But unless they're able to generate responsive layouts and markup that's not semantic & clean, it's not useful beyond that.
Of course, this is not a photoshop->responsive tool, but it skips the first part.
* Gridset (http://gridsetapp.com) -- for working out your grid and bringing it into a prototype
* Typecast (http://beta.typecastapp.com) -- design with web fonts
* Easel (http://easel.io) -- a browser-based alternative to Fireworks
* CSS Piffle (http://csspiffle.com) -- haven't actually used this yet but looks similar to Easel from the outside
* Adobe Muse (http://www.adobe.com/products/muse.html) -- not well received but maybe an indication of Adobe's future direction
[disclaimer: I'm part of the Typecast team].
Photoshop and Fireworks are great and I don't see many designers abandoning desktop software entirely. But I think there are plenty of tools that can help you get into the browser more quickly.