The title is unnecessarily provocative-- Square wouldn't magically eradicate downtime after a starbucks deal.
And the website being down is different from the service not working. [Edit: the payment app doesn't work on my iPhone either. I guess I spoke too soon]
I would prefer that a mod change the title to remove the implication that Starbucks caused the outage. If a user believes that Starbucks did cause the outage, or that the the temporal proximity of these two events is significant, I suggest a blog post explaining the significance.
"Square is down" is a perfectly acceptable title, IMO.
Square Support @SqSupport
We apologize for the connectivity issue this evening. The issue has been fixed and we're taking steps to ensure it doesn't happen again.
Expand
Reply Retweet Favorite
23 comments
[ 2.7 ms ] story [ 60.8 ms ] threadAnd the website being down is different from the service not working. [Edit: the payment app doesn't work on my iPhone either. I guess I spoke too soon]
Edit: Apparently it was a cached page in my browser.
Square.com is now using squareup.com SSL certificate.
Does this mean Square, Inc. already acquired square.com?
Edit 2:
square.com automatically redirects to square.com
whois info still says that square.com owned by Square Enix.
"Square is down" is a perfectly acceptable title, IMO.
Square Support @SqSupport We apologize for the connectivity issue this evening. The issue has been fixed and we're taking steps to ensure it doesn't happen again. Expand Reply Retweet Favorite