1 comment

[ 2.9 ms ] story [ 10.6 ms ] thread
Yep, it passes. But it could be much, much better:

1) It's clearly not for the dial-up users, even though there's still a lot of them 2) Semantic IDs and class-names would really be nice. I disagree with some of the choices made for elements and headings too, but whatever.

The main issue I have with it is that they were too lazy to check their site with YSlow and correct some of the basic issues: minifying JS and CSS, settings up ETags and Expires Headers, and bundling those CSS and JS files for the deployment version of the site.

Other than that, great! A really, really nice site for those of us on faster connections. :)