Ask HN: What is your fallback job if AI takes away your career?
For the sake of argument, assume that if your job consists of sitting at a computer, reading on a screen, and typing on a keyboard, then your career will go away.
There is always room at the top, and there may always be room for humans at the top of any career. Assume (this is a tough ask, I know) that you are NOT one of those people.
What is your fallback job? What skills do you have or would like to acquire that might keep you going? Bicycle mechanic? Teach music to children? Woodworking/carpentry? (Living off your stock options or investments does not count)
205 comments
[ 2.8 ms ] story [ 326 ms ] threadI'd guess something else driving/piloting some kind of vehicle that isn't as saturated.
Sure some jobs may go.
But ultimately there will certainly be new jobs created by AI that in turn will make an abundant future for all of us.
And what if there aren't? Hope is not a strategy.
Americans are losing spending power, say researchers - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44270120 - June 2025
Most Americans don't earn enough to afford basic costs of living, analysis finds - https://www.cbsnews.com/news/cost-of-living-income-quality-o...
https://lisep.org/mql
Oh good so after spending $40k on my education to be a valuable software engineer and build things I get to spend another $40k on some sort of retraining to be one of the ever shrinking professionals who make any money in the US.
What a great outlook that is. I guess I'll put off owning anything for another 20 years? Maybe by the time I'm 50 the world will stop throwing "Once in a generation" events at me and I can have a hope of actually building a life with my family.
A lot of us are going to end up driving ubers and delivering takeout to the 5% of the US that makes all the money. They only have so many needs to serve so plenty will just starve.
AI gets the investment it does explicitly because their intention is to not pay humans anything ever again. There's not going to be new jobs to go to.
If every developer is now 10x more productive, most businesses will be able to downsize until they start to be outcompeted by competitors who decided to build 10x better products rather than downsizing. The current norm is to keep the same productivity and shrink the workforce outside of small startups.
My expectation is more crap produced faster, and/or by fewer people.
That's been the trajectory of software product development for the past twenty years, at least.
It will certainly reduce low-level clerical work, so plenty of jobs will, are already, going, but new jobs will of course be created.
But what if we get actual AI? All bets are off then. The only jobs left will be very specifically human jobs. The oldest profession, probably.
But if I can't do that, maybe I'll be a pastry chef instead.
Former copyeditor here. That ship has already sailed. The suits realized the copy desk was a cost center that they could live without.
For the most part they were right. The burden of copyediting and proofing fell to writers and editors. Print publications were closed down, and everything shifted to digital, meaning errors could be corrected after the fact (often after readers caught the mistakes). Technology also helped catch errors before publication (spelling and grammar checks, software like grammarly, etc.)
All the people with that title I used to work with were laid off years ago and are in different careers now (mostly in marketing, but one person is an emergency services trainer).
I think where the real skills gap exists in the AI world is fact checking and getting the "voice" right. I don't think the hallucinations problem will be solved, and AI generated and copyedited text is so milquetoast.
In Seattle, I feel like I could get really far on a dumb, single-issue platform: "I will fix the potholes on 1st ave." I won't talk about anything except that. I'll only try to accomplish that. And then I'll leave.
I hear Dominos is hiring if you want to leverage the power of the private sector for pothole filling. ;)
The deeper point is that the skills that were mentioned are very important in terms of getting along with a variety of people.
>[they] are good at spinning answers to make everyone hear what they wanted to hear.
To me that definitely reads like the original comment was alluding to an ability to bend the truth or frame things in an advantageous way, which is essentially lying's brother, manipulation.
Besides, politicians have earned their reputation a hundred times over. Good luck convincing anyone that it's unfair to suggest politicians are liars.
Wish there were more like her!
Politics make Silicon Valley startup culture like a stable career. You only hear about non-starving politicians because you only hear about the successful ones. Politics is extremely hard which is why only people with no technical skills can make it (they max out on emotional/social skills).
Handymen with good customer service skills could probably do quite well?
The same thing I do now, but different: support. Everything ~burns~ breaks
Similar plans, but the problem I have is that property taxes are onerous anywhere near a population center.
The food you grow can likely sustain you depending on where you are in the country, you can dig a well for water, and you can buy solar panels for power. But the taxes never go away.
You can pay someone upwards of $10,000 to drill a well for you. FTFY!
It gets concepts wrong, and can’t resolve interweaving narratives which a human can follow without issue. The advice it gives is generic and impersonal, and if you’ve ever had real therapy, you immediately sense of it’s short comings.
I’m sure a lot of that gets less noticeable as training and models get better, but it seems like we’re plateauing in the returns we get from more training.
Human knowledge is not the same thing as human experience. Create an AI that experiences the world autonomously, experiences trauma and come back to me.
I say this as someone who uses AI and doesn't completely dismiss it like many on HN these days. So far, I don't see it replacing the human being for connection and understanding. Replacing coders? That's a whole other question.
Sure, I'm old enough to remember when that was a lot, and I only missed that kind of (paid) user base being "take the whole company across the Atlantic to celebrate" level by a year or so, but these days it seems like even a million paying users gets a "meh".
(If you mean "all users including ones who don't pay", as I recall my Mac shareware around 2009/10 got about 10k downloads in a few months, of whom something like 1% actually paid).
But painting can earn a really good amount of money. Once you know what you're doing, you can make $3-5k in ~2-5 days, but it's a hustle, and you may not always have clients.
One of my kids painted for a while. He made good money but business tended to come in waves (mostly during the summer when apartements and houses changed over) and not much in winter (worked well with his being a student at the time).
But reaching over your head with a brush or roller for 8-12 hours a day will eventually cause RSI.
Winter does slow down, especially in the north. I live in Florida now, though, so painting is done year-round. I don't paint anymore, but I do miss it.
> But reaching over your head with a brush or roller for 8-12 hours a day will eventually cause RSI.
Absolutely.
The terrarium plants get acclimated in 2” pots. Aquarium plants go straight out in vitro.
I’ve got some blueberries on the go as an experiment because I know a farmer who would like to buy them, and that could be a future avenue to do higher volume. But at this point I’d prefer to stay away from agriculture if I can. I enjoy it, but it doesn’t really keep me ticking like the others do.
A plus is that this gives enough free time and energy during the late afternoon and evening hours to do interesting tech work.
Have you heard of Warren Buffet's 1 million dollar bet? Even professionals on Wall Street can't beat the S&P 500. You think you can?
https://www.investopedia.com/articles/investing/030916/buffe...
Why would they hire me over a teenager or someone slightly older? Because I’ve proven for 20+ years that I’ll show up and do the work. I’ve already figured out that I can “survive” on minimum wage. My house is paid for. My truck is paid for. I put “survive” in quotes in hopes that I don’t have cancer diagnosed or some kind of heart disease and need long term medical care.
quite how they expect capitalism or liberal democracy to survive this scenario I don't understand
there will be mass unrest long before it gets to this point
Bizarrely quite a few of them don't want it to survive. [1]
[1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_Enlightenment
For most of history, the majority of people were born into rigid social positions with little mobility, owing labor, tribute, or service to elites who controlled land, resources, and political power. Personal autonomy as we understand it was rare.
As modern people, we see this backslide as impossible. Surely we'll fight back if this happens, right?
But what if we won't? What if we just make do, as we always have. Our ancestors adapted to feudalism, slavery, totalitarian regimes, caste systems - not just the beneficiaries, but the oppressed too. History suggests that people are remarkably capable of normalizing and accommodating to systems that previous generations might have found intolerable.
I don't have faith in the general public fighting back against this new wave.