8 comments

[ 5.7 ms ] story [ 29.4 ms ] thread
• Trapit Bansal: pioneered RL on chain of thought and co-creator of o-series models at OpenAl.

• Shuchao Bi: co-creator of GPT-4o voice mode and o4-mini. Previously led multimodal post-training at OpenAl.

• Huiwen Chang: co-creator of GPT-4o's image generation, and previously invented MaskIT and Muse text-to-image architectures at Google Research.

• Ji Lin: helped build o3/o4-mini, GPT-4o, GPT-4.1, GPT-4.5, 4o-imagegen, and Operator reasoning stack.

• Joel Pobar: inference at Anthropic. Previously at Meta for 11 years on HHVM, Hack, Flow, Redex, performance tooling, and machine learning.

• Jack Rae: pre-training tech lead for Gemini and reasoning for Gemini 2.5. Led Gopher and Chinchilla early LLM efforts at DeepMind.

• Hongyu Ren: co-creator of GPT-4o, 4o-mini, o1-mini, o3-mini, o3 and o4-mini. Previously leading a group for post-training at OpenAl.

• Johan Schalkwyk: former Google Fellow, early contributor to Sesame, and technical lead for Maya.

• Pei Sun: post-training, coding, and reasoning for Gemini at Google Deepmind. Previously created the last two generations of Waymo's perception models.

• Jiahui Yu: co-creator of o3, o4-mini, GPT-4.1 and GPT-4o. Previously led the perception team at OpenAl, and co-led multimodal at Gemini.

• Shengjia Zhao: co-creator of ChatGPT, GPT-4, all mini models, 4.1 and o3. Previously led synthetic data at OpenAl.

So much wasted money it makes me sick…

There are so much money needed to solve another problems, especially for health.

I don’t blame the new comers, but Zuckerberg.

Come on everybody, please don't post shallow dismissals. This is in the site guidelines: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html.

That includes personal attacks, regardless of who it's about. When a comment has a high bile/information ratio, it's off topic here.

You may not owe $CelebrityBillionaire better, but you owe this community better if you're participating in it.

I'm couldn't be more disgusted by sama@'s response to Zuck's strategy:

23:05 the strategy of a ton of upfront guaranteed comp and that being the reason you tell someone to join like

23:10 really the degree to which they're focusing on that and not the work and not the mission Um I don't think that's

23:17 going to set up a great culture Uh and you know I hope that we can be the best

23:24 place in the world to do this kind of research Uh I think we built a really special culture for it and I think that

23:30 we're set up such that if we succeed at that and a lot of people on our research team believe we will or we're have a

23:36 good chance at it then everybody will do great financially and it's I think it's incentive aligned with like mission

23:42 first and then economic awards and everything else flowing from that So I think that's good There's many things I respect about Meta as a company Um but I

Un hun.

Sam Altman's critique of Meta's recruitment strategy is a textbook example of startup rhetoric. By framing high, guaranteed compensation as a cultural failing that detracts from the "mission," he attempts to moralize a clear economic disadvantage.

This is the core of the startup playbook: persuade employees to forsake their financial best interests in favor of high-risk, high-reward "adventures." There's nothing inherently wrong with that pitch, but the subsequent sanctimony is galling. When talented individuals make a rational choice for their own benefit, Altman's insinuation that they aren't the "people that mattered" is both revealing and repulsive. He's not angry about a breach of principle; he's angry that Zuckerberg is outbidding him.

Sources