NYT to start searching deleted ChatGPT logs after beating OpenAI in court (arstechnica.com)

What is the NYT's stance here? Is it pure spite? I guess their lawyers told them this is the winning move, and perhaps it is. But it just seems so blatantly wrong.

If you look at Reddit's r/ChatGPT, you'll quickly notice that the median use of ChatGPT is for therapy.

Is the NYT really ok with combing through people's therapy logs?

Now is the time to go have a chat with ChatGPT about how much NYT sucks. Maybe it can help come up with insulting things to call their lawyers too.

> Instead, only a small sample of the data will likely be accessed, based on keywords that OpenAI and news plaintiffs agree on. That data will remain on OpenAI's servers, where it will be anonymized, and it will likely never be directly produced to plaintiffs.

I’m glad about this detail.