13 comments

[ 1.7 ms ] story [ 30.5 ms ] thread
While neat, I feel like in the current age of "let's throw shitloads of packets and see how they like that", this solves _a problem_, but I feel that most of the security products solve it by anycasting IP ranges.

Neat to see another use case for NGNIX though!

Is there a significant difference between this and nginx proxy manager?
I'm still strongly suspecting this whole WAF thing is mostly complete bullshit intended for projects doing security works mostly from spreadsheets.

Could someone with a proper background in security confirm or invalidate my suspicion ?

How this compare against safeline?
SafeLine is much easier to config, more user friendly. BunkerWeb requires much more time for tuning.
I just love this project! BunkerWeb was a huge help when I was self-hosting my products with Docker Swarm. It offers tons of configuration options—especially useful for those needing a WAF and dealing with heavy bot traffic.

Since moving to Kubernetes, I haven’t used or evaluated it there yet, but kudos to the team for continuing to update and improve the project. Keep up the great work!

I can't unban myself from the demo :)
What % of cloudflare's protection can this provide? I've been looking at bunkerweb + anubis as alternative to cloudflare tunnel (im actually not sure if this provides WAF)
looks very cool, I could use this. Given how much I have watched all sorts of automated things hammer websites on multiple servers, I believe everyone should use something like this.

Had a hard time finding the premium version price, aka pro - saw $170 and thought to myself, I don't know. Then I saw it was a monthly fee.

$1500 per year, and I'm not sure what 10 services even means, for me I'd probably need more, and I wouldn't spend 1500 on it if it was a one time lifetime.

I get that I am not the target market. I just wish it was faster to find that out.

Glad I didn't waste more time looking at the cool features.