23 comments

[ 5.6 ms ] story [ 49.5 ms ] thread
The weight of all ants on Earth is roughly equal to the weight of all humans- aka there are a lot of ants. And can be found everywhere mammals are able to live. So they make sense as a food source
While comparing things... a colony of leaf-cutter ants (which form some of the largest colonies with as many as 2 million individuals when the colony is mature) has roughly the same metabolic rate as cow (easily measured from the CO2 at the exits of their nest). So don't think of ants as tiny animals, think of ant colonies as fairly large animals.
From an evolutionary standpoint, it totally makes sense to adapt around that buffet
You may not like it, but this is what peak mammalian performance looks like.
At the end of all things, when evolution has reached its inevitable end, all that will be left is a war between ant eaters and crabs.
I think cockroaches might have something to say about this.
> At the end of all things, when evolution has reached its inevitable end, all that will be left is a war between ant eaters and crabs.

From reading the aritcle, it seems that ants are really crappy as an energy source:

  One thing myrmecophages share is an almost insatiable appetite — ants and termites are so low in energy that even a small animal like the numbat must eat about 20,000 termites a day
I think this explains why Anteaters spend most of their day doing nothing but sleep -- they barely get enough calories from eating ants.
Did any anteater dinosaurs exist before that?
I can see the shear abundance of ants tilting the scale of evolution's nonlinearity.

Reminds me of Mitch Hedberg, ~"[Ants are] great if you're ever really hungry and want to eat 2000 of something."

how many times things evolved into sharks?

ichtiozaur, dolphin/orca

anything else?

Beyond ichthyosaurs and cetaceans, carcharhinification (shark-like convergent evolution) also occurred in plesiosaurs, mosasaurs, certain teleost fish like barracuda, and even the extinct thalattosuchian crocodylomorphs.
I guess we’ll see if they have the endurance. Sharks have been around for a while after all. But, Orca have surpassed sharks in terms of badassery, right? And it isn’t that close. They aren’t evolving into sharks, they are the upgrade!
The mosasaurs also developed a caudal fin (vertical, like sharks and ichthyosaurs, not horizontal like whales and dolphins) and eventually they became quite shark-like, though not as fish-like as ichthyosaurs.

Between ichthyosaurs (who evolved in Triassic) and mosasaurs (who evolved in Cretaceous) there existed also a group of marine crocodiles (Metriorhynchidae; who evolved in Jurassic), which also had caudal fins and were quite shark-like.

So there have been at least 4 groups of amniotes that looked like sharks, cetaceans among mammals and at least 3 groups of diapsids.

However all these marine predators looked like sharks from the point of view of locomotion, but none of them had the kind of teeth specialized for cutting that are characteristic for sharks. Teeth resembling those of sharks are found only among some other fish, e.g. piranhas, whose bodies do not resemble sharks.

Top-shelf HN thread! So far I have learned:

- the evolved 12-times thing

- ants are descended from wasps

- insectivorous aardwolves

what a day

Kind of wild to think that ants and termites became so successful post-dinosaurs that mammals just kept re-inventing themselves to eat them
I sometimes think how AI will change things on evolutionary time scales. We've had hundreds of millions of years of evolving reproducing DNA coming up with different body types being the main thing going on on earth and now we'll have a new digital life like thing going forward.