4 comments

[ 3.6 ms ] story [ 16.6 ms ] thread
The proof superficially look super interesting. Especially bc it's not in style of usual LLM babble fillers. It's like almost exactly opposite, very efficient use of words and eliminating parts of grammar not important. Reminds me of how people write down proofs in drafts/how we communicate proofs with peers before writing final versions.
This is incredible. We know these questions are not in the training data. How can you still say that LLMs aren't reasoning.