Certainly not, as anyone with YouTube or Rumble knows. There have never been more such talk shows than there are now. But cable TV's efforts can't compete.
The paradigm used to be that “late at night” means kids aren’t likely to watch. So, you had a bit of room to get away with things. Now, that doesn’t apply in the same way when things are on demand. So there’s still a desire for the types of content, but it’s not dictated by the broadcast timeslots.
Here's what I don't get. If this genuinely had nothing to do with the Paramount settlement or the merger, then why did it come immediately after that? Wouldn't a corporation that cares so much about optics want to at least wait a bit to give the impression these are unrelated, if they could? Is there a plausibly explanation here?
actually operation mockingbird was the cia press influence op. project mockingbird was a different shadowy US government op that was about spying on journalists
9 comments
[ 1.8 ms ] story [ 22.2 ms ] threadParamount probably can’t afford him anyway.
People are known to watch late night show highlights at a different time, on demand.
Nice fit for digital.
He will end up on existing cable networks, or the cable networks of the future, whether it's a Netflix et. al, or Youtube.