When people oppose adding technology and AI to the mix, they often do it under the assumption that human judgement is generally of high quality.
> Another study, although small, found that when doctors predicted in the first 72 hours that a patient would not recover from a traumatic brain injury, they were frequently wrong.
As evidenced here, it is not.
I am all onboard with not letting AI pull the plug by itself, but adding it in the mix with the mediocre humans as an "are you sure?" check seems like it should be a priority.
AI is so far down the list of what needs to be fixed here. This is a social problem. If you introduce some opaque “AI” measurement scale, you make this easier to obfuscate and juice.
I read a news some time ago where a guy was organ donor and the docs wanted to literally kill the guy to take his organs lmao
He stopped being organ donor the same day.
4 comments
[ 3.3 ms ] story [ 21.7 ms ] thread> Another study, although small, found that when doctors predicted in the first 72 hours that a patient would not recover from a traumatic brain injury, they were frequently wrong.
As evidenced here, it is not.
I am all onboard with not letting AI pull the plug by itself, but adding it in the mix with the mediocre humans as an "are you sure?" check seems like it should be a priority.