Proof by Contrapositive Is Wrong

1 points by slack3r ↗ HN
Proof by contrapositive is wrong. There is a true, false and undecidable case also.

Let me explain how it works.

p. =>. q. does not necessarily imply not q ==> not p. There are three cases here. If not q is true, then p can also be undecidable.

1 comment

[ 15.6 ms ] story [ 13.1 ms ] thread
If p is undecidable in that case, then p ==> q is false. The meaning of the statement p ==> q is that p is never true without q also being true.