12 comments

[ 3.7 ms ] story [ 36.2 ms ] thread
Evolution or revolution? They’d better deliver, as Gemini has been hogging all the attention and open source models are fast catching up.
If it were any good I would assume there would be no need to hype it up.

My theory is that LLMs will get commoditized within the next year. The edge that OpenAI had over the competition is arguably lost. If the trend continues we will be looking at inference like commodity prices, where the most efficient like cerebras and groq will be the only ones actually making money at the end.

They can call it whatever they want…not sure that has a great deal of meaning unless there’s a GPT-4/Claude 3.5 level step change.
> Altman decided to let GPT-5 take a stab at a question he didn’t understand. “I put it in the model, this is GPT-5, and it answered it perfectly,” Altman said.

If he didn't understand the question how could he know the model answered it perfectly?

What's the point of this article besides free propaganda? It seems to me like every other AI shop except for OpenAI and possibly Anthropic only gets mentioned once they actually release something.
There’s so much work to be done developing coding related tools that integrate AI and traditional coding analysis and debugging tools.

Also programming needs to be redesigned from the ground up as LLM first.

OpenAI promises too much and delivers too little. It promised "Agent mode" and "Study and learn", but I have neither despite paying for the service.

I get the impression that OpenAI will rename what's intended as o4 to gpt-5 and package it as such.

Are they going to require my DNA and blood samples to access this ?

Screw their organization verification. I am taking my business to Claude or Deepseek.

Are they losing so many customers to Anthropic, Gemini, etc that they have to pre-announce this?