7 comments

[ 2.6 ms ] story [ 25.7 ms ] thread
Good. Debanking and censorship through blocking payments or withdrawals or storage is bad for free societies. All sides should be against this.
I assume like all things this administration this is really just pressure to favor their friends and causes. Time and again this administration's claims are "stop this bad thing other people do" and the result is just "do it for me ... but more".
Supreme court said people could deny business to anyone for any reason during the gay couple cake fiasco, no?

If dude wasn't fed from a silver spoon, he'd know better and watch his lying mouth.

Isn't this order an example of DEI?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diversity%2C_equity%2C_and_inc...

The President would seem to be saying that conservatives have historically been discriminated against, not treated equally, and excluded by banks, and banks that continue to do this should be punished. As a DEI executive order it should serve as an example for punishing any corporation that discriminates, excludes and is unequal in it's policies, and sets a great legal precedent for all DEI policies and a reversal of all administration anti-DEI policies. The executive order would also seem to be "woke" in that it supports underprivileged conservatives who are being discriminated against.

I have never been asked by a bank, credit union, or investment broker if I am conservative. Can a conservative explain to me What the hell is the issue?