6 comments

[ 4.2 ms ] story [ 24.1 ms ] thread
> We believe that all agents will long more like this in the future - long running, asynchronous, more autonomous. Specifically, we think that they will:

> Run asynchronously in the cloud

> cloud

Reality check:

https://huggingface.co/Menlo/Jan-nano-128k-gguf

That model will run, with decent conversation quality, at roughly the same memory footprint as a few Chrome tabs. It's only a matter of time until we get coding models that can do that, and then only a further matter of time until we see agentic capabilities at that memory footprint. I mean, I can already get agentic coding with one of the new Qwen3 models - super slowly, but it works in the first place. And the quality matches or even beats some of the cloud models and vibe coding apps.

And that model is just one example. Researchers all over the world are making new models almost daily that can run on an off-the-shelf gaming computer. If you have a modern Nvidia graphics card, you can run AI on your own computer totally offline. That's the reality.

I was excited by the announcement but then

> Runs in an isolated sandbox Every task runs in a secure, isolated Daytona sandbox.

Oh, so fake open source? Daytona is an AGPL-licensed codebase that doesn't actually open-source the control plane, and the first instruction in the README is to sign up for their service.

> From the "open-swe" README:

Open SWE can be used in multiple ways:

* From the UI. You can create, manage and execute Open SWE tasks from the web application. See the 'From the UI' page in the docs for more information.

* From GitHub. You can start Open SWE tasks directly from GitHub issues simply by adding a label open-swe, or open-swe-auto (adding -auto will cause Open SWE to automatically accept the plan, requiring no intervention from you). For enhanced performance on complex tasks, use open-swe-max or open-swe-max-auto labels which utilize Claude Opus 4.1 for both planning and programming. See the 'From GitHub' page in the docs for more information.

* * *

The "from the UI" links to their hosted web interface. If I cannot run it myself it's fake open-source

Very cool! Am using it now and really like the sidebar chat that allows you to add context during a run.

I hit an error that was not recoverable. I'd love to see functionality to bring all that context over to a new thread, or otherwise force it to attempt to recover.

> Double texting: Most coding agents don’t support accepting new requests or feedback while they’re running.

This caught my eye too. Given they say 'most', what other tools that support this?

Nice, but I want exactly the opposite. I want my agents to run locally without any sort of black box and I certainly don't want to be stuck with whatever UI you've designed to interact with the git provider you've selected.

It's not a super surprising coming from this pole of over engineering so thick I'm surprised it wasn't developed by Microsoft in the 90s or 00s

Unfortunately, after using langchain and the rest of their ecosystem extensively, I have very little faith in their abilities. The fact that the top contributor to langgraph is an agent they built is a huge red flag from my perspective.