2 comments

[ 5.1 ms ] story [ 18.5 ms ] thread
Can I sketch out one future of news for input?

- Personalized

- No adverts

- No hidden dopamine hooks

- Assigns probability of accuracy

- Explains relevance to you personally

- Explains emerging news events and context, highlighting propaganda/news manipulation where relevant.

I have zero pity. Zero. Because what kind of metric is this?

- Google is invented and brings lots of traffic to publishers for many years.

- Publishers drink from the firehose, getting used to a lot of traffic. To get even more traffic, quality goes down, SEO spam goes up.

- Publishers give zero fucks about readers privacy and install a gazillion trackers (personalized ad networks)

- Google makes AI snippets with similar quality to the SEO spam on publishers websites resulting in less traffic.

- Publishers whine, because they realize that their spammy unsustained business practices kinda suck for readers and most readers weren’t loyal after all.

- Publishers blame Google, because they felt entitled to this low-quality traffic they got so used to because of their SEO spam.

Anyways. We can talk about the necessity of a general purpose search engine. We can talk about Google‘s role in stealing content from websites. But these are different topics and for now, I’m sick of whiny publishers.