Comparison of different C libraries providing generic containers capabilities (github.com) 43 points by lemper 1y ago ↗ HN
[–] fuhsnn 1y ago ↗ I'd love to have some of these libraries in slimcc's test pool, but almost every one of them have hard-coded assumptions to gcc/clang/msvc/tcc in their scripts that are tiresome to undo. For example:MLIB: assumed GCC https://github.com/P-p-H-d/mlib/blob/4b9c213831624486814a483...STC: assumed -fopenmp https://github.com/stclib/STC/blob/de7313a58f748d9a6da751eb9...CC: assumed clang https://github.com/JacksonAllan/CC/blob/main/tests/run_unit_...
2 comments
[ 2.5 ms ] story [ 14.6 ms ] threadMLIB: assumed GCC https://github.com/P-p-H-d/mlib/blob/4b9c213831624486814a483...
STC: assumed -fopenmp https://github.com/stclib/STC/blob/de7313a58f748d9a6da751eb9...
CC: assumed clang https://github.com/JacksonAllan/CC/blob/main/tests/run_unit_...