Sounds awesome, but this article seems to be an LLM rewrite of a press release:
> This article is based on verified sources and supported by editorial technologies.
Is there perhaps any other news about this plant or process, maybe with additional context on what will determine the market viability of their approach?
That's really cool! And if before recycling your (ebike) batteries you want to repair them, check out what we've designed in France at Gouach: https://gouach.com
Cuz I know in San Diego a lithium battery recycling project just cleared government inspection to shred and recycle batteries at ANY SoC, which is a major improvement vs most any other li-ion recycling facility which needs those batteries drained as much as possible before recycling begins.
I can imagine that it could be, having to grab thousands of batteries and figure out where their leads are. Is that the issue, or is there something else?
Are we allowed to flag AI-generated articles? I feel like we should be.
I certainly did flag this one, it starts with an egregiously stupid AI "illustration" of the plant, and ends with "This article is based on verified sources and supported by editorial technologies", aka an AI wrote this.
Low-effort, full of inaccuracies = get that out of my sight, please.
10 comments
[ 0.37 ms ] story [ 41.8 ms ] thread> This article is based on verified sources and supported by editorial technologies.
Is there perhaps any other news about this plant or process, maybe with additional context on what will determine the market viability of their approach?
Edit: I could not find anything yet.
Cuz I know in San Diego a lithium battery recycling project just cleared government inspection to shred and recycle batteries at ANY SoC, which is a major improvement vs most any other li-ion recycling facility which needs those batteries drained as much as possible before recycling begins.
I can imagine that it could be, having to grab thousands of batteries and figure out where their leads are. Is that the issue, or is there something else?
I think it would make more sense to reuse them:
1) use them in a car for 10 years
2) then pull them out then use them in a home for 10 more years
Recycling the batteries instead of #2 seems to me like recycling last years CPUs and GPUs for the silicon content.
or alternatively, it seems like grinding up lease return vehicles to be "green" (and conveniently get rid of the secondary market for used vehicles)
So its nice the US has a competitor here
I certainly did flag this one, it starts with an egregiously stupid AI "illustration" of the plant, and ends with "This article is based on verified sources and supported by editorial technologies", aka an AI wrote this.
Low-effort, full of inaccuracies = get that out of my sight, please.