5 comments

[ 4.4 ms ] story [ 22.9 ms ] thread
The one good news about this piece of brilliant German bureaucracy is that this legislation would be the easiest to ignore.
Germany could soon be declared illegal by Mozilla and others.

That said... this is a wrong move. We all know that. But like I said before, those marketing associations have loads of money and they make politics happy.

Then there is the elephant on the room: Google. What they lobby and done with Chromium to change the browser so it won't be possible to block ads, it is a huge disaster for the people.

Facebook is also the problem. The company that want's to track you from age 0 up to you die. And since they do track you from the moment you have a computer (aka smartphone), they will spend the money companies give them for them to put ads on your face.

Let's not forget also Amazon and many other advertising companies.

Privacy and data collection are the main concern here. Since that already happens, we should not be talking about ad blocking. We should be talking about how to split Google and Facebook in several companies. And make them stop collecting people data and active tracking.

The remarkable state of affairs here is that this has nothing to do with blocking ads. These sites can serve ads the same way they serve all their imagery. They don't do that because it's more profitable to turn your device into a tracking and serving mechanism. By the same argument they could claim the right to mine crypto across all their visitors' devices.
If Germany moves forward with classifying DOM/CSS modifications as a copyright violation, this could set a really troubling precedent—not just for ad blockers but for any extension that customizes the browsing experience (like accessibility tools or dark mode). The browser is supposed to be user-controlled. Curious how courts will distinguish between legitimate user customization and illegal alteration