15 comments

[ 4.1 ms ] story [ 34.5 ms ] thread
I always enjoy reading about the theater of international diplomacy. In many ways — humorous and depressing — it’s not that different than the school yard.
"(The U.S. ambassador to Switzerland virtually never gets summoned.)"

After the new 50% tariffs, I doubt this remains true.

Interesting the story that led to this question. France has said that it will recognize Palestine, and so the US ambassador wrote a letter falsely accusing the French of antisemitism for recognizing Palestine.
Virtue signalling, hand wrangling and mostly jostling in international affairs. Nothing of consequence. Just daily business
Earlier this year, the US recalled their ambassador in Brazil and asked permission for the local government to nearly double the embassy's building size on the same week. (And kept both actions on the long term.)

Try to understand that.

Even the term itself is pretty misleading, as the answer notes, the vast majority of purported ‘summons’ are not actually made with the threat in writing that they will be punished if they don’t show up.

Those real summons are very rare.

It is a formal statement by one country that they don't like what another country is doing.

It can be serious. Worst case, an ambassador is summoned to receive a declaration of war. That's happened many times in the past, especially when travel delays meant wars took a long time to start. That's rare today.

This time, it's not that serious. Here's the statement by the foreign ministry of France: [1]

France learned of the allegations of the US Ambassador, Mr. Charles Kushner, who, in a letter to the President of the Republic, expressed his concern about the rise in anti-Semitism in France and reported an alleged lack of sufficient action by the French authorities to confront it.

France firmly refutes these allegations. The rise in anti-Semitic acts in France since 7 October 2023 is a reality that we deplore and to which the French authorities are fully committed to combating, as such acts are intolerable.

The Ambassador’s allegations are unacceptable. They contravene international law, in particular the duty not to interfere in the internal affairs of States as provided for in the 1961 Vienna Convention that governs diplomatic relations. Furthermore, they fall short of the quality of the transatlantic relationship between France and the United States and the trust that should result between allies.

Ambassador Kushner will be summoned to the Quai d’Orsay on Monday, 25 August.

Charles Kushner (Jared Kushner's dad, Jared Kushner being Trump's son in law, married to Ivanka Trump) and the US embassy sent their chargé d'affaires (a temporary ambassador while the real one is unavailable) instead. That can be read in several ways. Although it's a mild diplomatic insult to send a substitute, the effect is to calm the situation a bit. It helps that the substitute is a professional diplomat, not a political appointee. Le Figaro says the meeting went reasonably well, but that's what's traditionally said unless a declaration of war results.

This should go away as an issue unless Trump starts screaming about it on social media.

[1] https://www.diplomatie.gouv.fr/en/country-files/united-state...

[2] https://www.lefigaro.fr/international/convocation-de-l-ambas...

There is an element of theatre involved, but it is also a way of sending a very clear signal that the France is not satisfied with the ambassador's behaviour.

When everything is going well, meetings between the Foreign Office and ambassadors remain private.The fact that the ambassador did not attend the meeting himself but sent a subordinate is a public affront.

What is strange is that the US ambassador's communication is not really intended for the French or French jews, but is merely a sign of support for Israel.

There is currently an Israeli media offensive in France followin President Macron's comments on the recognition of a Palestinian state. The Israeli state and its supporters are buying advertising spots on YouTube and Instagram to encourage French Jews to do their ahria with free money.

There are regular attempts to exploit anti-Semitic crimes or news stories to claim that France is hell on earth for Jews and that Israel is there to save them. But then again, we haven't yet seen Belgian commandos coming to kidnap people in France or Luxembourgers launching rockets.

The only new thing is that the US ambassador is taking part in this type of operation and behaving like an arsehole with the French Foreign Office.

If not to represent their country in a foreign country, what do these ppl think the role of Ambassadors is?

People haven't watched The West Wing etc and it shows

Australia expelled the Iranian ambassador yesterday. Can anyone give an insights as to what happens during this processes?

I guess diplomatic relations are severed until an ambassador returns to the host country.

These formal diplomatic notes are .. what? A piece of headed notepaper? An email? Some XML message validated with a schema?
US ambassadors are a disgrace right now. They do not behave like guests or communication bridges but actors influencing local politics. But that is not the purpose of the embassy concept.

As a world we have to return to normal and respectful behavior instead of bullying everywhere. The US under Trump is just one thing: a bully.

With great power comes great responsibility. That is the standard men (and women) are hold accountable.

Can we take a moment to appreciate how much better an answer that top answer was than if we'd typed it into our LLM of choice.