17 comments

[ 3.4 ms ] story [ 29.8 ms ] thread
Only overseas? If the Pentagon is deploying troops in DC, why not AI too?
I assumed they were already doing this domestically.
Imagine an AI impersonating your friends and relatives and trying to tell you that you are not trans/gay/green/vegan or whatever the president doesn't like that very morning.

They're building the Ministry of Truth.

If you need an AI and propaganda to convince someone instead of neutral, rational, and educational means - then guess what, you are in the wrong.

[flagged]
I would be unsurprised that the US wants to "suppress dissenting arguments" using anything at their disposal
Flip side is we just use AI to promote dissenting arguments.

This feels like the war on drugs and it won't end well in that nobody wins.

Other governments already do this. See China’s 50 cent army:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/50_Cent_Party

And the USSR had its propaganda arm too. The US also effectively did this but without the same labels criticizing them - for example recently when the Biden administration was pressuring tech companies to censor or ban opinions they didn’t like.

The fact that AI may now be used for this purpose isn’t offensive. It’s that governments (or corporations or any other group) interfere with free speech much more broadly than we think, and don’t just limit that to a few exceptions. Whether the use people or AI, it’s wrong.

but they're not doing here it at home, of course. that would be silly
Anyone who's been paying attention to AI probably already has an intuition that this is the whole purpose of companies like OpenAI.
I think we head in a direction where people will not trust digital content altogether. The question is what will happen thereafter? What are new and reliable trust indicators?
That must have been the plan behind buying Twitter, even if not the Pentagon’s.
Past mind control experiments have all failed, but there is hope!
Or the Russian way:

> We characterize the contemporary Russian model for propaganda as “the firehose of falsehood” because of two of its distinctive features: high numbers of channels and messages and a shameless willingness to disseminate partial truths or outright fictions. In the words of one observer, “[N]ew Russian propaganda entertains, confuses and overwhelms the audience.”

> Contemporary Russian propaganda has at least two other distinctive features. It is also rapid, continuous, and repetitive, and it lacks commitment to consistency.

> Interestingly, several of these features run directly counter to the conventional wisdom on effective influence and communication from government or defense sources, which traditionally emphasize the importance of truth, credibility, and the avoidance of contradiction.3 Despite ignoring these traditional principles, Russia seems to have enjoyed some success under its contemporary propaganda model, either through more direct persuasion and influence or by engaging in obfuscation, confusion, and the disruption or diminution of truthful reporting and messaging.

* https://www.rand.org/pubs/perspectives/PE198.html

It’s easy to blame the United States for psychological operations, but the reality is that every country around the world is working on this and has this goal.

Basically every country is working on this technology. The US is doing it. China is doing it. Russia is doing it. Europe is doing it.

Propaganda is everywhere

Like all the other projects it has failed, "just run some AI on it" will not be successful here, either.