Tell HN: My advice after I applied to 450 positions before getting hired

135 points by usernamed7 ↗ HN
I wanted to briefly share my experience as a senior engineer with 15 years of experience trying to find work in this market, because it was exhausting for me and i'm sure others will appreciate the perspective.

As the title says, I have applied to over 450 positions. Most companies did not even send me a rejection. Ghost jobs are a thing, so are fake roles to get you to signup/join some rando job board.

I interviewed for a director of engineering role, and all interviews went well, but they ghosted me at the end.

I did several take homes and all were accepted, but companies dragged their feet on next steps.

I did reject a few kinds of roles: ones that used AI for interviewing me, ones that had me do a coding challenge as the first step, and jobs that had "no working hours" and expected you to be "on" 24/7.

Many of the job applicant expected me to answer asinine questions like "what excited you about this role?" and would say things like "don't use AI! we want your true self" or would go so far as to try to get you to agree to their AI interview policy. As If.

I eventually did get hired as a software architect. the company that hired me was very professional, respectful, forward thinking (i used windsurf during the interview) and did not play games with me. They had a 4-step interview process, and asked a lot of good questions. One of the best interview processes of my career.

My advice to other engineers on the job market:

  1) Spray and pray. If its vaguely a fit, apply. It's a numbers game. Be shameless. 
  2) Always be willing to walk. Protect your time. Don't waste your time on lengthy job applications that take too long to complete. Some hiring managers will gladly waste your time. (one job application explicitly wanted you to spend 20 minutes filling out theirs)
  3) Don't do coding exercises before you interview with someone, be weary of asymmetrical time expenditures. see #2. 
  4) You can probably do a lot of different roles, "prompt engineer" is a real job title companies are hiring for, for example. 
  5) Work a couple of different job platforms. For example I used linkedin, dice, ziprecruiter, weworkremotely, and rubyonremote and a few others.
  6) Use AI to generate your resume, but feed it all the context of your work history (don't misrepresent your skills)
  7) Use AI to fill out asinine job application questions, but if they ask you thoughtful questions answer those yourself. I got the interview for director of engineering because i answered authentically to thoughtful questions.
  8) Pace yourself. Spend a few hours a day at it then come back in a day or two and go again. 
  9) Work on a side project or learn a new lang/framework in parallel. 
  10) Interviewing is like dating, everyone is looking for something different, and some don't really know what they want. Not a you problem.
  11) If they use workday for their job applications, bounce. It's the worst. 
  12) It takes time as roles become available. The job you end up getting might not open until 2 months from now. see #1.

52 comments

[ 4.2 ms ] story [ 71.3 ms ] thread
thanks for sharing and congrats. solid stuff! I would add that expect tripple the amount of applying and ghosting if you are mid-level.
Did you try using a recruiter? Not one that works for a company but one that matchmakes between candidates and companies. My last three jobs I've used a recruiter and this worked great as a filter.
Congratulations on getting hired in this garbage market! I wish you well!
Reading your advice, I think that explains why it took 450 applications. Nobody liked spray and pray, AI generated resumes.

In my experience it’s much better to spend much more time on a target application to a company you’ve researched and maybe reached out to people or met current employees.

At the last company I worked for in the U.S., I was part of the hiring process and as a result of a combination of rampant cheating and AI spam - we had to completely revise our procedures and settled on the following rules:

1. Minimum of a BCompSc or adjacent field (using a dedicated academic verification service)

2. Brief 30 minute phone screener

3. On-site interview

The jobs were actually fully remote positions, so we would rent out a shared workspace where we would conduct the interview itself. We found that this cut down on the chaff by about 90%.

Nice advice. How long did the process take? How many hours a day did you spend doing all this? You say, pace yourself, send a few hours, does that mean it took you months to find and apply to 450 jobs? Did you read company reviews on Glassdoor?
Considering it took 450 applications, perhaps this isn't the best advice. Perhaps in the future, employers will use a centralized system that tracks and limits the amount of applications a person can do to prevent this sort of AI spam
senior engineer for what?
Your spray and pray technique is flooding HR departments with AI generated applications. This blocks out people who are actually qualified for the role as they get drowned out by the "shameless" who apply for anything that "vaguely fits".

This is horrible advice and exactly why the job market is so broken.

Even if you're only applying to one opening per company per day, from a recruiter's perspective your application is likely to be equivalent in value to most of the 1,500 other applications they have still to weed out. Your advice boils down to "stop applying to tech jobs."
Isn't blocking other applications a strategy?
This is probably my approach (maybe minus the AI), I do think networking and reaching out to people can yield better results but I was never any good at that
> 1) Spray and pray. If its vaguely a fit, apply. It's a numbers game. Be shameless.

I just skipped the rest of the steps after reading (1) and completely stopped reading after (6).

This is poor advice and it is no wonder you had to send 450+ applications and I think people reading this would want to do this with less steps and less than 450+ applications.

This is not poor advice. It's what's required to land a job in this market if you've already exhausted your network. If you can land a position using your network, yeah, that's definitely going to be a better/easier route, but when your network is also unemployed/not hiring at all/involve fields you're not suitable for, spray and pray is the only way you're going to get something now days. Though i'm hesitant to back the AI usage, and personally haven't resorted to it.
I don’t know in what world you live (or in what world I do live for that matter). I used to apply to one or two jobs in the past when I was looking for something new. I prepared each interview in advance for a couple of weeks. Nowadays it’s harder… but I apply to 3 or 4 job ads, not 450! It’s harder because obviously it takes two or 3 times what it used to take me. I have around 12 years of experience in a few different tech stacks, I read tech books regularly, I don’t have a good professional network, I do find jobs via linkedin, I’m based in western europe, and I have a masters degree in comp sci (but no one ever has asked me to show my degree).

In my cv I care a lot about the details: the typeface, margins, grammar (I use llms since i’m not a native speaker), bullet point order, succinctness, etc. Perhaps that counts for something. Then if I get an interview, that’s like already 50% of the job done. Im an easy guy imho. I have failed mainly systems design interviews, so that’s where I put some work nowadays.

One of my friends mentioned how on the hiring side it's not much better.

Here'a a recent case for a remote software engineering role for a US based company:

A position is posted publicly, in 2 days it gets 300 applicants. Out of those 300, 9 are selected for interviews. Of the 9, only 2 showed up for the interview. Both candidates weren't close to a good fit (skills didn't match resume, etc.).

It opened my eyes on the process. Imagine an engineering manager getting handed a few hundred resumes and now they need to hand select ones that move onto the next phase. This takes a huge amount of time and it also indicates if your resume isn't strong, you will probably get passed over in a few seconds.

With that said, he told me most of the applications were AI spam.

> ones that used AI for interviewing me

> Use AI to generate your resume

> Use AI to fill out [...] job application questions

The irony is strong on this one, and one person's "asinine" question is another person's "thoughtful" question. It's a bit hard to take this seriously.

Congratulations on landing the job! I have to ask though: Why do you think the "What excited you about this role?" question was asinine? IMHO questions like those are totally valid, even in a technical interview.
The truth is most people's aim will be get more money, isn't it? but employer usually wants employer say something "big", they don't like the answer: for getting more money.
I disagree. If the market is stacked against you and it takes even 30 attempts to get a job through the usual job seeking process, then I question whether you're truly going to be happy and satisfied with whatever you happen to get offered after months of searching. If you're lucky, maybe. But the most probable reality for most people is that you'll be an expendable employee with zero leverage in a position that doesn't suit you. Not to mention the probability of getting serious burnout from getting rejected and ignored hundreds of times. A fair, healthy job market does not look like this.

If something is not working out, change up your approach. The first obvious step is to try networking instead of applying. Perhaps start something on your own, becoming a B2B service provider rather than an employee. Or try to out-compete the companies which have rejected you. Be a stalwart, not a pushover.

In 10 who interviewed me, only 1 or 2 knew about the job. All others recruiters did not have a single clue on they were talking about.

Job was about Linux admin and I told one about bash programming and that I like and know about it. At the end, he says "there are some things I did not hear like scripting in Linux..." and I just went ok, thanks for you time, bye.

A recruiter’s job is not to know anything technical. The good ones are contracted by companies to recruit people.
Spray and pray is why it takes everyone longer to get hired. Companies have to sift through thousands of resumes of people that aren't qualified and shouldn't have applied in the first place.

Common advice on Reddit is also to lie about your experience.

The irony is that because of both of these, it takes longer to get a response and get through the interview process.

> Many of the job applicant expected me to answer asinine questions like "what excited you about this role?"

I don't see this as a asinine/foolish/stupid thing to ask. It's helpful for both sides:

- potential employee can provide an honest opinion on their motivation, in a targeted, specific way to highlight their talent. - offering company can use it for evaluating mutual fit, as well as filter out generic trash applications.

It’s a pretty easy question! I always categorize my answer in a few parts - why am I excited about the product (helps people! Makes the world a better place!), the technology (I like how it is a combo of hardware and software!), and specifics from the job posting itself. Hopefully you can have a good answer otherwise why apply?
These are very bad advice, and it's clear why you needed to send 450 applications.

I've only once applied to a job I didn't get, and I've had more than 10 jobs.

It's called networking.

Here is one advice to rule them all:

Talk to people and build a network for yourself.

I would appreciate it if you could describe the interview process in more detail for the position you accepted.
This type of thing is why I was essentially forced to start my own solo company. There isn’t a force on earth which could make me subject myself to all that.

Enjoy your jobs those who will. I’m choosing a different life, even if it doesn’t dump endless money into my bank account.

I understand the spray and pray sentiment, but I cannot recommend enough hustling connections at the companies you’re targeting. Channel your inner SDR and stalk the company, the people you’d work with and the best guess at who would be your boss. Clearly don’t be creepy, but connecting on LinkedIn, mentioning you’ve applied, generally seeing what these people are up to is 100% free and you might even spot an event they’re attending that you could “bump in to them”. It’s so hard for someone not to do some sort of follow up if you’ve met them face to face and had a pleasant conversation such as recommending the hiring manager follow up with you etc. Having a direct connection means you can also prod someone every couple of weeks if you haven’t heard anything from your initial application. Most of the time people are embarrassed their company is being slow on processing good applicants. It’s hard but it really makes you stand out from the pure spray and prayers.
I have tried stuff like this but I feel you know much more about it than I do.

Can you low-key coach me how to do this better? My email is in my profile.

Emphasis on low-key. I don’t want to take too much of your time.

Sure, I’ll drop you an email.
> 3) Don't do coding exercises before you interview with someone, be weary of asymmetrical time expenditures. see #2.

I hope no one outside of highly experienced individuals applies this rule when looking for a job in 2025.