original title: Europol said Chat Control doesn’t go far enough; they want to retain all data of all citizens forever [Washington Post source in comment]
I mean, of course they would say that. Europol's job would probably be a whole lot easier if they had access to all conversations, media, live feed of webcams from all devices of all European citizens with unlimited history. Think of all the crimes they could solve if only there was absolutely no privacy for any of us!
"those services should include publicly available interpersonal communications service"
Only publicly available messengers are liable.
So if one writes a messenger herself (not too hard) and only distributes it to her friends, family, or a close circle of child porn lovers, one is not liable.
I can see a valid use for a version of chat control where the communications of all elected officials are retained forever and audited on a regular basis for doing anything illegal, proposing anything illegal, actions not in the public interest, cronyism etc. All data should be released when they die, 10 years after they leave office or upon conviction of a crime related to political appointment.
Patrick Breyer has an article how American foundation Thorn is heavily lobbying Europol for this stuff. And there's some cross hiring going on according to him.
Clearly it's not even just "for the children" anymore. Just plain old panopticon surveillance. I guess they want their NSA too. Though they forget that NSA is only for terrorism purposes, their data is not too be used for regular policing.
Really sensationalized title, the source is "an unnamed Europol police official" so it basically boils down to personal opinion, not the official stance of Europol as a whole. Although I'm sure they aren't alone, sensationalizing really doesn't help to have a sensible discussion about it...
I think sensationalization is more or less warranted. We get these proposals regularly. Discussion is futile, you can just as well call everyone names at this point.
The Europol is a EU support body, and not a federal police. They can't by law apply coercive measures, and its staff cannot execute investigative measures. It can only assist national police, can request, but not compel and may ask Member States to open investigations but the Capitals can say no.
It's nothing more one of the examples of EU bureaucrats trying to justify their inflated EU salaries. It is mostly coordination paperwork that inflates Brussels chaos without direct crime fighting effectiveness.
Should be closed as each country police already cooperates as needed. They are nothing more than a support only EU agency requesting bigger scopes to justify their existence.
Did they say that? We've got a Reddit post showing a screenshot of a quotation from an anonymous person during an unnamed meeting, but not much else to go on here.
27 comments
[ 1.9 ms ] story [ 43.1 ms ] threadEvery request by law enforcement must be opposed. Do not talk to cops. Do not give them an inch. Ever.
They are insatiable and power-hungry. Nothing will suffice. A police state will still be a million police officers and some stricter laws short.
Only publicly available messengers are liable. So if one writes a messenger herself (not too hard) and only distributes it to her friends, family, or a close circle of child porn lovers, one is not liable.
Clearly it's not even just "for the children" anymore. Just plain old panopticon surveillance. I guess they want their NSA too. Though they forget that NSA is only for terrorism purposes, their data is not too be used for regular policing.
https://www.patrick-breyer.de/en/chat-control-eu-ombudsman-l...
It's nothing more one of the examples of EU bureaucrats trying to justify their inflated EU salaries. It is mostly coordination paperwork that inflates Brussels chaos without direct crime fighting effectiveness.
Should be closed as each country police already cooperates as needed. They are nothing more than a support only EU agency requesting bigger scopes to justify their existence.
They have another interesting article: https://balkaninsight.com/2023/09/25/who-benefits-inside-the...
Follow the money also has a few articles about... Well, money and thorn and eu csam regulation
Chat Control and whatever is following from that is just the beginning.
And then you compare this. Let's say you do get scammed into transferring money. Can Europol, or any police department, help you? No ...
Think of the children!
https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2024/03/05/encrypt...
(https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39609846)
Can start a discussion here without reddit threads of random article screenshots.