14 comments

[ 9.4 ms ] story [ 944 ms ] thread
archive: https://archive.is/nRLrZ

Though in general i think science needs more rigor, this a was a fund article with a legit point. And the findings listed on drinking were interesting. (does reduce pain, and some people don't get hung over)

Can absolutely vouch for the pain reduction aspect. It's not exactly a pointed anesthetic in the way some medications are, but alcohol certainly dulls a lot of aches and moderate pains of the body. Though I think this is also partly due to the distracting effect of relaxed and socializing while drunk. Love it either way, in moderation.

Also, i'm one of those people who rarely suffers anything resembling a hangover, even after those rare nights of heavier drinking, but then maybe drinking only hard spirits helps, because sugar-loaded alcoholic drinks like wine, beer and cocktails are famous for creating some of the most monstrous hangovers among those who get hangovers in general.

More rigor is always good, but there’s also value in studying messy real-world behavior as it happens
> And if they did, a team of neuroscientists from the local university was waiting to gently torture them.

> The researchers were on site to test how well alcohol can numb pain.

> “Ethically, we can’t ask people to drink alcohol to levels they do in their day-to-day lives,”

> the point beyond which they felt proper consent was hard to establish.

How is this study ethical? Researchers declared they do not need formal consent, because that would be too hard, and just went on, to torture impaired people!

Universities were going on and on, how drunk people can not consent, and even saying hi to someone in a bar is unethical! And now serious research institute pulls this stunt with torturing people without their consent!

This is getting downvoted a lot, probably because the title makes it sound frivolous which it isn't; it's a legit case in how to do a naturalistic study.
Posts can't be downvoted, only flagged.
Ok, flagged then
With all our smartwatches and social media apps tracking us, aren't we all already part of some giant, unofficial naturalistic study?
They’re not drunk, honest.
There's definitely a tradeoff in terms of experimental control, but the real-world insight seems worth it.
This post and the update to the DOD. Is there a connection?
In college I was part of a research lab that did alcohol behavior studies at student parties. One thing we learned early on: the presence of alcohol testing turns it into a drinking contest. At least with stupid young college boys.

We'd show up to a frat party with a survey and breathalyzers and got people to line up before things got ... weird. As soon as word caught on that we were measuring blood alcohol levels, the boys would start chugging alcohol at dangerous rates to see who could blow the highest BAC. So much for promoting safe drinking behavior! And this would obviously invalidate the research, so we had to go in like a strike team and collect as much data before word got out!