13 comments

[ 4.5 ms ] story [ 33.4 ms ] thread
This is great! Now I can find out how many countries I can visit in a day by train efficiently
Any idea why Spain and Portugal have such small isometric zones? An obvious factor is the mountains in the North, but I'm surprised there isn't easier access between the Iberian peninsula and France
Ireland does not seem to work.

Interesting that Spain and Portugal seems so disconnected.

For the German trains I would add the qualifier "theoretically" or "with a lot of luck" considering the high chance of delays.
For commute visualization, this is great but of course real commutes require more time at either end. The train part of the commute is usually the least awful part - it’s the unreliable transit and pedestrian-unfriendly terrain that grinds your soul to a nub.
I find the new version of the site more practical, as you can enter stations: https://www.chronotrains.com

I always thought of this visualization type as kind of a gimmick, but recently used this site for planning a vacation. I was visiting one place in the middle of the country and wanted to find some time efficient way to travel to "some coast" as the second part of that journey, inside the UK. The travel time was very much dependent on the specific main lines rather than geographical distance, so that was very helpful.

It's a little hidden, but Google Maps (web version) has a walking or driving travel time feature under: Layers -> More -> Travel time
It's _very_ optimistic.

It states 6:01 for going from my parents to my home, in reality it's over 8 because switching trains is rarely within 10 minutes.

It would be interesting to layer it with an elevation map.

We can almost make out the contours of the mountain ranges. For example if you look at France, there is like a big hole in the middle of the southern half of the country, that all train lines seem to avoid. That's the Massif Central mountain range, the largest of the country and a sparsely populated area. Same idea with the Apennines in Italy.

Compare to relatively flat countries like Germany and Poland where it is much more uniform.

You could use a population density map too, but if a low population area is flat, express trains tend to go straight through them instead of avoiding them, which give some spotty coverage rather than none at all as it is the case in mountainous areas.

This would be interesting indeed, but I did not see such a discrepancy. I tried a few cities around Massif Central (starting with Clermont Ferrand) and the coverage is not bad.

By not bad I mean that there is a way to reach the places bu choosing cities around the region. I did not say that it is easy :)

I wish it had data available for Japan and China.