31 comments

[ 5.8 ms ] story [ 88.9 ms ] thread
Why do they not pay for streams? Is this a “cable sub cost is too high” or a “broadcasters want to blackout stream so only locals and the right networks can see the game” situation?

EDIT: “One thing that we have learned is that piracy is not a pricing issue. It’s a service issue,” explained Newell [0]

[0] https://www.gamesradar.com/gabe-newell-piracy-issue-service-...

This has been going on for years. A VPN is practically mandatory nowadays.
Right now if you want to use internet on weekends you need to pay a VPN.

Even some online games on Steam stop working. I've seen also a several Twitch streamers who can't stream, startups down, etc.

We're basically hostages of this stupidity. And you know the funny thing? Football streams are working just fine. Now I feel morally obligated to watch pirated football and never pay them for it.

It easier for me to watch La Liga in the US than it is for my brother in-law in Spain. Thank goodness we don’t have the reckless anti-piracy actions here but we do have some of the same BS going on because the same is true for him in reverse. Its easier and cheaper for him to watch the Red Sox in Spain than it is for me in Boston. 1yr of MLBtv is 30 bucks but local blackouts. 1 month of NESN the local broadcaster is the same price. Streaming all sports is a fragmented and extremely expensive mess for the fans and it only seems to be getting worse. I don’t blame people for cheating. Especially in Spain where incomes are significantly lower than the US.
Can the service providers somehow block illegal streaming themselves? That way no third party services would be affected?
Sucks to have to spin up the VPN anytime there's a match. Wonder how much money are Spanish companies losing out on online sales over this crap.

Have this: https://hayahora.futbol/ on my bookmarks every time some site doesn't respond.

Imagine if the MPAA/RIAA knew about this during the 2000's to use against the Kazaa, Limewire, etc during that era anywhere/everywhere. It is so overreaching the Internet would have been stalled at the time.

It is astonishing the court systems for those countries to allow this if, other than maybe football factors into their GDP (which says something about the nation, maybe they should find something more useful to produce). Just for some silly sports event watching man-children kicking balls around.

I grew up in the US as sports were just something on tv, but this is practically holding the nation hostage as though it were a religion, and the world should stop just so they can sell tickets for the only one god, theirs.

I ordered a new 4G router here, I've been having so many failed connections, now it all makes sense, in a non-sense kinda way. Anna also gone dark, just when I was traveling and missing a book.
(comment deleted)
I had to use i2pd plus some mirror to update my BSD systems...
I can't intuit moral reasoning for why a media rights holder has the right to restrict a rebroadcast. They put it out there to reach a wide audience. Why can't I receive it and share it?

I can play physical copies of music and movies wherever I happen to bring them. Why can't I do it with the digital variant?

Largely I feel like the response to this is a rephrasing of 'because no one will be able to monetize the creation of entertainment'. But that's not a moral reasoning, that's a choice of how to foster a market. Which undermines the explanation of this being about piracy. We can try other ways of growing a market that doesn't inhibit an intuitive natural urge to share.

A few months ago I cancelled my subscription to watch LaLiga. I won't pay a single euro to these tyrants who impose censorship on innocent people.
Why is there no responsibility for that? And not just LaLiga, but everywhere?

You can claim copyright on anything anywhere, things get taken down, zero responsibility if it was wrongful, be it laliga streams, be it youtube copyright strikes or whatever?

If there was a law, that if you took down something that you shouldn't have taken down (eg. hundreds of pages), you should be liable for all the damages and income loss for those pages. Same for youtube... copyright strike, proven fair use.. now pay for the lost income of the creator, the creator (webmaster, ...) did nothing wrong, you should be liable for that.

I'm from Spain, never watch football or pay any attention to it at all, and this year I noticed the day that the Liga started due to the internet suddenly working like crap. After various websites failing to respond I thought "I bet the football season has started again", I googled it and indeed, it started that day. I resubscribed to my VPN right there and then.

This situation (which has already been going on for a year or so) has made my attitude towards football change from "I don't like it, but live and let live" to outright hate.

Since LaLiga has no qualms with blocking Cloudflare IP's that could be used for emergency services. A cautionary tale:

In 2025, Optus suffered a network outage that prevented emergency calls (triple-0 in Australia) for nearly 14 hours. During this period, four people died, including an eight-week-old baby. The outage was reportedly caused by a botched firewall upgrade that affected up to 600 households in South Australia alone.

https://7news.com.au/news/optus-deaths-firewall-upgrade-repo...

I feel like affected ISPs and hosting services should identify LaLiga office IP ranges and block them during office hours.

Or just feed them a never ending series of cloudflare turnstile captchas.

i've been trying to understand what was making the CI fail for about 3h, until i realised it was this thanks to this post.

thanks. this sucks.

If the service use cloud flare expect for trouble :(