11 comments

[ 0.24 ms ] story [ 23.4 ms ] thread
Has anyone written a history of launch pad characteristics and assignments and upgrades and conversions at Cape Canaveral/Kennedy ? So many stories.
I'm a big SpaceX fan, but as far as I can tell, this doesn't contain any real updates. It's just aspirational thinking.
Probably a stupid question but if rocket launches really became as commonplace as airplane flights, would we see some kind of increase in global temperatures?
They also disrupt ozone layers and leave combustion byproducts in the trail. CO2 raises temperature but dusts reduce temperature, idk which of those effects are dominant or if it makes sense to mandate an additive or something.
I think the context some may be missing here is that Blue Origin and ULA have been attempting to get the FAA to limit SpaceX's planned Starship operations in Florida on the basis that they will have too much environmental impact and impede theirs:

https://arstechnica.com/space/2024/07/theres-not-enough-room...

So this is basically SpaceX arguing back about how these concerns aren't valid or can be mitigated through more informed safety margins and co-operation between launch providers.

Has SpaceX revealed what they plan to do with the Texas Starbase once they start launching Starship from Florda? Will they just stop using it?
> Liquefaction is a process where saturated, loose soil loses its strength and behaves like a liquid, often occurring during events like earthquakes.

That would be quite an environmental impact!

  Whenas in silks my Julia goes,
  Then, then (methinks) how sweetly flows
  That liquefaction of her clothes.

  Next, when I cast mine eyes, and see
  That brave vibration each way free,
  O how that glittering taketh me!