39 comments

[ 3.1 ms ] story [ 66.8 ms ] thread
(comment deleted)
It feels like being 12 on the pre-bubble internet. I must look like my 20yo cat playing with catnip toys.
… iiiit's the Stay-Puft Marshmallow Man.
Million dollar homepage vibes, good stuff!
Beautifully amazing. Though I never got a chance to send a prompt, as all the rooms appear full to me. It's a bit frustrating to have no indication whether you're going to be in a queue, or if it's just random chance.
all my prompts are rejected by Gemini under reason IMAGE_SAFETY :(
It'd be nice to have more concurrent rooms, there's no way to riff off what's already in the room when the queue fills up in the first few seconds.
...and the credits are used up
anyone wanna run ads or sponsor inference credits and keep the fun going?
I was late to the party and it’s just debris now.

Could anyone who saw it explain what it was?

  Error: Gemini error 429: { "error": { "code": 429, "message": "You exceeded your current quota, please check your plan and billing details. For more information on this error, head to: https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/rate-limits.\n* Quota exceeded for metric: generativelanguage.googleapis.com/generate_reques
429... sums up the entire AI industry
What was AI used for in this ? not able to access the room right now

-- The room is now closed for the night. Come back soon.

Got here too late so seems like it went viral.

So, it was a really good idea?

I'm just gonna assume that by the time I see this comment, it's already too late.
Do you have a gallery of the additions? Or the last version?
Just charge to put something in the room. Problem solved. People pay for less.
It's weird to me that I've been using the internet for 30 years, and there's still no convenient way to be able to just chip in 20c for something. Paying anything is still a big clunky process.
Ok OP we need to link up and make this in 3D.
What does it mean I'm getting "unprocessable entity" ?
The biggest issue you have right now is that it's far too easy to completely replace the original room by deliberately or accidentally floodfilling it out of existence.

I'd recommend several possible methods to fix this:

1. Set a MIN_ORIGINAL_IMAGE as a percentage - though it'll have to be a perceptual check since Nano degrades the original image. When it falls below this value, reset the counter.

2. Setup an intermediary LLM to determine if the user's instructions are "malicious"

3. Add system instructions to Nano Banana that coerce user prompts to only allow them to fill in a "portion" of the original image