This is very interesting, but I'm wondering how it compares to just using a dynamic language like Python or Ruby for the same tasks. Curious how the line count to express the same tasks would come out.
This would have been great 10-20 years ago, or even at the coining of Unix pipes. By today's standards, however, the syntax feels clunky and dated. I'd like to see contemporary shells like nushell and elvish copy these ideas, with attribution of course, in a more modern way. That is the best way I can see to honor this stagnant project: https://github.com/dspinellis/dgsh
12 comments
[ 1.5 ms ] story [ 32.8 ms ] threadIn English, this makes me think of the phrase "dig shell". I guess we just have different things on our minds...
:-p
Dgsh – Directed Graph Shell - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21700014 - Dec 2019 (11 comments)
Dgsh – Directed graph shell - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13352659 - Jan 2017 (51 comments)