I await a critique by competent philosophers. In the meantime I suspect in both French and English, syllogistic reasoning will be used to buttress what is otherwise just assertion of fiat statements. "No other rational explanation" sentences tend to mean "I believe"

According to this article, their conclusion seems to be "if there's a big bang, what set that off? obviously it's god, like duh and stuff" Which is basically "if you can't prove it's not god, then it's god" Well I then say it's the invisble pink unicorn or the flying spaghetti monster that created god.