39 comments

[ 4.3 ms ] story [ 53.9 ms ] thread
(comment deleted)
Are there any good-faith justifications for an American military censor?
These quotes are crazy to me, what kind of world are they living in?

> “I think he finds the press to be very disruptive in terms of world peace,” Trump said. “The press is very dishonest.”

I'm pleasantly surprised that journalists are doing this due to how tepid news companies generally are.
a rare instance of american journalists showing spine.
Time was when the liberal press looked down on journalists who were embedded with the military. The article mentions one who has had a desk in the pentagon for almost two decades. I would question the independence of someone so well embedded and note nobody is resigning here, just moving to other offices.
Ah, "We are currently clean on OPSEC"
This is move by the journalists is inspiring to be honest, ending press freedom is what they want.
What I want to know is: why would anyone else bother staying given these new rules?

If you did agree to the terms you'd be limited to publishing the official story (and can't talk to anyone for off-the-record stuff), but you get that for free anyway even if you never show up, so why bother with the extra expense of actually going to the Pentagon?

There's no right answer. Stay and you can only publish the approved messaging except maybe once. Go and you give them a shroud of secrecy.
It seems like basically the only ones who stayed are OAN; in their case it's probably just a demonstration of loyalty to Dear Leader. As you say, being there under those rules seems otherwise rather pointless.
First sign of a profession having a backbone in months.

Although the silent treatment the generals dished out at recent meeting wasn’t bad either

Curious how long this will actually last before the outlets cave under access pressure again. Has anything like this worked before?
Not a US citizen but affected by the current trajectory of the policies by the current administration.

I wonder at what point in time people will have enough with what they are changing. How does the HN crew based in the US think about the current administration?

The American people need to start prosecuting their war criminals, plain and simple - and this has to begin with a willingness to comply with the mandates of the International Criminal Court.

The notion that American exceptionalism inoculates America's war criminals from facing justice at the hand of International bodies set up specifically for that purpose, is incorrect and anti-human.

It is time for justice.

You can't maintain this culture of warrior narcissism, Americans.

It will end in tragedy - as it has already brought chaos and calamity to millions of innocent people across the globe, this century. The USA and its allies are, by a huge margin, the #1 cause of terror and war on the planet at this time. Nobody even comes close to the level of criminal war-mongering that occurs at the behest of the US' political establishment. No, not Russia. Not China. The USA and Five/Nine Eyes states are #1 at illegal war and murder of innocent human beings, bar none.

Come to grips with the crimes of your state. It is the #1 most important thing for Americans to do, for the rest of the world.

The American people are the only force on the planet which can reign in their monsters. It has to be done by the people, for the people.

This kind of boycott needs to happen for the WH press corps. If there is a fear of not being selected to ask questions, or being expelled from the room for asking tough questions, then everyone needs to walk. Immediately.
Pathetic posturing.

With an access badge, at least you can leak something important anonymously.

While what the government is doing more widely is quite scary, this in isolation seems sensible?

I don't really get what the journalists' role is? To goad and harass employees of the Department of defense in to slipping up and saying more than they should? To encourage people to leak information?

Given the secretive nature of the whole institution, It seems sensible that there is some formal process for deciding what information should and shouldn't be shared. The previous setup seems sort of insane.

If the army is putting babies on spikes and it needs to be leaked.. it seems that that should happen outside of the Pentagon itself and shouldn't involve getting some government approved badge...

I am so proud of the journalists for standing up to what is right.

It seems to me there is some hope for America after all.

Are we sure this isnt exactly what the current administration wants to happen? Less press so they can get away with more?
Good. Journalist should not have some special access compared to your any person off the street. Such things only lead to un-democratic ends.
All of those newspaper-led coups d'etat throughout history...
I couldn't find what the restrictions are? Does someone here know?