19 comments

[ 4.5 ms ] story [ 84.4 ms ] thread
(comment deleted)
I noticed republicans are more likely to act like a guys who took too much testosterone and now cant handle own feelings and aggression.

Or more realistically, lets wait whether it will be reproduced.

136 males? Fooled by randomness
I would be interested to see the flip side. For weakly affiliated Republicans, what is the effect, if any? Obviously, 136 is a very small sample size, so I won't be updating one way or another based on this.
The potential for trolling and general idiocy is high here, so I'll tread carefully. I think this is an uncomfortable truth that the Democratic party has yet to effectively internalize and address; and they will continue to struggle and frustrate themselves until they do. There is very little in current left-wing philosophy that provides any sort of meaningful place or role for masculinity as it is commonly understood. Then, when Democrats or other left wing political parties struggle to win over men, they resort to name calling and try to right off masculinity writ large, causally throwing around phrases like "toxic masculinity".

As much as it has gone out of fashion, the masculine and feminine are ever-present parts of the human psyche and human experience, which is why they can be found and understood across cultures, space, and time. Carl Jung and others who explore archetypes and symbols understood this well. You can't ignore a fundamental component of the human experience and expect your philosophy/worldview/politics succeed long term.

Define what you are talking about if you want to put your stake in the ground so people can respond. What is masculinity as it is commonly understood?

I believe men should be willing to fight for the group. Republicans think it should be every individual for themselves. I believe in myself enough I don't need to surround myself with the same religion/race as me. Republicans are afraid they will be replaced. I believe men should be able to have sex, and that birth control should be legal so they can do that. Republicans don't believe that. I believe in hanging out with my bros. Republicans love to hang out with pretend bros by listening to podcasts.

I believe I should be self sufficient and shouldn't need a surrogate mother to take care of me. So I do my own laundry, I cook, I clean. Like a real grown adult human. I believe enough in myself enough I don't need to sequester my partner away from the world and keep them at home.

These are like THE defining masculine traits. Protect others. Secure in yourself around others. Having sex. Being engaging enough to hang out with. Be self sufficient. Confident enough of yourself not to be jealous/overprotective of your partner or need to keep them hidden away at home. Republicans have none of these.

I live in a red state. All the REAL men (forresters, park rangers) are dems. Now the short guy rolling coal in his ridiculous truck, sure, he's a republican. The cop wearing a bulletproof vest while on duty in my tiny mountain town, sure, he's a republican. I guess that's the masculinity the right talks about. The appearance of masculinity. Not ACTUAL, lived, legit masculinity.

You can't cite Jung and be expected to be taken seriously in 2025. Type "Animus and Anima" in Google and see how crackpot this all sounds and looks.

Republicans are stuck with their backwards views, and they shut their mind completely to concepts like "patriarchy", which elicits violent, automatic reactions from them. I am yet to see a single guy from the right correctly define what "patriarchy" means to the left, and understand that the leftist projects by no means intends to harm men as a group.

To the contrary, liberating men from having to conform to a specific ideal is extremely freeing. So is not being berated for their height, lack of big muscles or whatever it is one "lacks" compared to the model man.

Black pill movement is a scam, get over it.
The research does not actually show "republican men have more testosterone than democratic men."
Wonder if increased testosterone made some of the subjects seek out hobbies/communities/etc. which in turn influenced them politically.

When I was in my 20s, I started really working out. This in turn opened my eyes to bodybuilding, fitness, and such. I became engaged in that, and the bodybuilding/fitness scene / community is (or at least used to be) very right leaning. Echo chamber of bro-science and populistic rightwing ideology.

Sometimes I wonder if microplastics are a bug or a feature for companies selling us food that contain them. Same with a lot of other products that mess up your hormones.
As far as I know, the science is settled when it comes to plastics, aerosols and hormones, so it does baffle me that this huge issue that affects us all is fringe and untouched while I see flags representing intersex people (am I evil for not particularly caring about this?) every day in the city.
Note this quote from the article:

“Weakly affiliated Democrats had basal Testosterone levels 19% higher than strong Democrats and all Republicans.”

So it's not as simple as "more testosterone means more Republican".

A government study… Interesting. And only because it's a government study, had it been a private institution, I would've thrown this away. But it's interesting… That is the NIH.
I thought this was surely a joke as it is a hilarious premise for a "scientific" paper

not much qualifies as statistically significant from a sample size of 136 men out of roughly 4 billion.

Hilarious and also a great example of how stupid peer review is.