Ask HN: How do you convince people to use privacy respecting technologies
I just submitted talk proposals for FOSDEM. It goes beyond my usual ramblings on what privacy foss tools we must use and it covers the "how" to convince people to start using them.
If you have encouraged someone to switch to say Signal, or Sessions, or XMPP or some other tool/protocol, please share here.
I need as much success stories as possible.
----- Anonymity is guaranteed if requested, you can use my Sessions messenger session: 0531634331f5b6be12375bf4229412eed3f2f3543cfe119df37e1b72c883143d4a
8 comments
[ 1.9 ms ] story [ 29.1 ms ] threadHow vigilant people are about privacy will vary greatly by generation and by group interests.
(That's how I've gotten a lot of folks on Signal: "It's like PGP, but usable." The phone number thing was a hangup for a while but with the usernames feature, that's gone.)
Of all the FOSS software that has made inroads with the masses, none of it has been due to it being FOSS or the privacy. People don’t use VLC because it’s FOSS, they use it because a video file didn’t play in the player they had, and VLC played it without and fuss.
Solve problems users have. They don’t see not being FOSS as a problems. So yes, make FOSS, but don’t expect that to be your headline feature. Like it or not, very few people actually care.
Privacy is a concept, it's not even a thing.