5 comments

[ 2.4 ms ] story [ 23.3 ms ] thread
Theres two NIMBYs that must be resolved that arent.

First is easier: where to build it.

The second is where the waste goes.

Historically, the second issue is not resolved.

This sounds great as long as they’re going to build more than, like, four reactors for $80 billion.
10.

"Westinghouse announced in July it plans to open 10 new plants in the U.S., with construction starting in 2030." -- https://www.ans.org/news/article-7499/westinghouse-signs-80b...

That actually sounds pretty reasonable to me. I’d love to see the cost curve come down some more on the next 10 plants after that, but if this comes anywhere close to panning out, seems like a net benefit.
It’s a “Trump deal” with absolutely zero information. It’s probably not going to amount to anything. Solar + battery is eating everybody’s lunch, and nuclear was way too expensive even before that.