C# has a lot of these little things, that can make you struggle until you discover them.
But beware with yield-return, you have to be very conscious of the execution model of LINQ. Take for example this piece of code:
IEnumerable<string> Readlines(Stream io)
{
while(io.CanRead)
{
io.Read(buffer, 0, bufferLength)
... do things with buffer and get a line...
yield return line;
}
}
IEnumerable<string> ReadFileLines(string filename)
{
IEnumerable<string> lines
using(FileStream file = new FileStream(filename))
{
lines = ReadLines(file);
}
return lines;
}
This would always fail and throw an exception. Why? When you call ReadLines, the actual object that is returned is not the list of strings. ReadLines is not executed until that list is not enumerated. ReadFileLines opens the stream, passes it as an argument and then closes the stream. When you enumerate that list, ReadLines will start and try to access a closed stream, which causes an exception. Read more here: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/charlie/archive/2007/12/09/deferred-...
EDIT: Another problem that you could face with deferred execution is that you could execute a method multiple times without noticing.
var lines = ReadLines(file);
var count = lines.Count();
var text = lines.Aggregate("", (acc, x) => x + acc);
This would read all the lines two times (one for count and another for aggregate), and would probably throw another exception because the EOF had been reached in the first execution. In other situations you could have a ultra-slow function because you're executing a heavy function with yield-return multiple times.
This is not a problem of yield-return on itself (as SideburnsOfDoom says, it's as easy as calling ToList()), but should remind you that using yield-return everywhere instead of lists is not a good idea.
Of course, but you can only do that if you know that ReadLines is using yield-return. If this method were to be used by other people you should use a temporary list to read all the stream before returning from the method; it's the expected behaviour.
Not just yield return. In quite a few different circumstances LINQ will return an IEnumerable<T> that is a wrapper over a query that won't be executed until you try and pull results out of it. LINQ Queries can wrap database queries, http results, active directory, file system or anything else.
And as you note, enumerating it twice can mean doing the underlying query twice, with potentially differing results.
In 2012, using bit shifting in your code for multiplication or division by powers of 2 is a bad idea. It makes the intent of your code less obvious and it's not always safe (think 2's complement negative numbers). The compiler or the JITter will make this optimization for you when it's appropriate.
11 comments
[ 2.6 ms ] story [ 37.6 ms ] threadBut beware with yield-return, you have to be very conscious of the execution model of LINQ. Take for example this piece of code:
This would always fail and throw an exception. Why? When you call ReadLines, the actual object that is returned is not the list of strings. ReadLines is not executed until that list is not enumerated. ReadFileLines opens the stream, passes it as an argument and then closes the stream. When you enumerate that list, ReadLines will start and try to access a closed stream, which causes an exception. Read more here: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/charlie/archive/2007/12/09/deferred-...EDIT: Another problem that you could face with deferred execution is that you could execute a method multiple times without noticing.
This would read all the lines two times (one for count and another for aggregate), and would probably throw another exception because the EOF had been reached in the first execution. In other situations you could have a ultra-slow function because you're executing a heavy function with yield-return multiple times.This is not a problem of yield-return on itself (as SideburnsOfDoom says, it's as easy as calling ToList()), but should remind you that using yield-return everywhere instead of lists is not a good idea.
And as you note, enumerating it twice can mean doing the underlying query twice, with potentially differing results.
... however the coding guidelines are to use the language keyword (i.e. "string" ) where you can.
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9033/hidden-features-of-c
The question is closed, but there are plenty of interesting answers.
One caveat: some idioms may seem really smart and/or terse, but others may have trouble understanding such code at at glance.