Judge Orders OpenAI to Give Lawyers 20M Private Chats – 'Anonymization' (techdirt.com)

Wouldn't every single American in that 20M people have standing (legal term) to prevent this?

anonymization wouldn't remove personally identifying data typed in. I can think of lots of examples.

In what way are these "private chats"?

These are instructions to a computer-based service that you presumably signed your rights away to when you accepted the T&C's?

Related:

Fighting the New York Times' invasion of user privacy

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45900370

We analyzed 47,000 ChatGPT conversations. Here's what people use it for

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45902767

never say anything to a cloud hosted chatbot you wouldn't want to see printed in the new york times

If it ain't zero knowledge, it's a corporate surveillance state bonanza.

If it's free or too cheap from a corporation, it's too expensive.