10 comments

[ 4.1 ms ] story [ 64.0 ms ] thread
Modulo I haven’t tried it yet it’s been an irritant that SIP broke tracing so this is a welcome development, thank you.
Neat, though I'm guessing it's pretty slow.

Tip for anyone reading: If you only need to trace file accesses or command executions, `eslogger lookup` and `eslogger exec` respectively will give you what you need (albeit in the form of a not-particularly-friendly JSON blob).

Silly question but doesn’t macos ship with dtrace? So why not use dtruss?
Love it. I've never successfully used dtruss without hardlocking my system, so it's nice to see that this isn't a wrapper around that.
Doesn't appear to work, and lacks pypi and brew packaging.

    $ pipx install git+https://github.com/Mic92/strace-macos
      installed package strace-macos 0.1.0, installed using Python 3.13.7
      These apps are now globally available
        - strace
    done!   
    $ strace df -h
    Error: Failed to load LLDB Python module.
    Make sure you're running with system Python (/usr/bin/python3) and have Xcode Command Line Tools installed.
    
    To install Xcode Command Line Tools:
      xcode-select --install
    $ sudo strace df -h
    [same shit]
After fixing[0] the awkward python system requirement, it doesn't work with built-in binaries without SIP disabled, it's really slow, it colorizes output even when piping, and the colors are terrible. Better than nothing but it's currently less effort to temporarily disable SIP for dtruss and reenable it later than install this in this early form. Maybe with time it will improve, but it seems like a vehicle to aggressively advertise consulting services.

0:

   env PIPX_DEFAULT_PYTHON='/usr/bin/python3' pipx install git+https://github.com/Mic92/strace-macos
It’s working. You deliberately ignored the requirements clearly stated multiple times in the README, which explains that it must use the same version of Python as LLDB because it relies on LLDB's Python bindings. The tool even explained again what you should do instead after you defied the installation instructions, yet you chose to run the same command again with sudo, turning this into a spectacle. This isn’t a software issue. It’s you messing around.

> it seems like a vehicle to aggressively advertise consulting services.

It's an open source tool that addresses a pain point many people have, made with someone's spare time with no strings attached. What is wrong with you?

> it doesn't work with built-in binaries without SIP disabled

You can't debug system binaries on macOS with SIP. That's the whole point of SIP. Debugging user binaries is still very much allowed.

    sudo lldb /bin/ls
    Password:
    (lldb) target create "/bin/ls"
    Current executable set to '/bin/ls' (arm64e).
    (lldb) r
    error: process exited with status -1 (attach failed (Not allowed to attach to process.  Look in the console messages (Console.app), near the debugserver entries, when the attach failed.  The subsystem that denied the attach permission will likely have logged an informative message about why it was denied.))
> lacks pypi and brew packaging

That's an entitled complaint against a project made just 2 days ago [1], which offers a single line command for installation.

[1]: https://github.com/Mic92/strace-macos/commit/712aaf14d07f2ef...

TIL Nix flakes work on macos - is this a legit alternative to homebrew?
This triggered a small emotional reaction. I really miss the days when Apple made real effort toward servers with MacOS X Server and Xserve. Hopefully, since they're using their own hardware/software internally for servers, Apple may one day go back down that road.