76 comments

[ 4.2 ms ] story [ 68.3 ms ] thread
We are witnessing the dawn of smell-o-vision teledildonic VR tentacle porn
The angle and position of the transducer would make them leveragable by future VR headsets.
that's an interesting mix of smells. i can't help but wonder if it's resulting from stimulation or the sensing of byproducts of the process itself.
I'd maybe make a hypothesis that a large portion of the space is "bad" smelling stuff: smoke or garbage. When people had covid-induced parosmia, it almost always seemed to be bad smelling stuff.
Super interesting! That would make sense, because a lot of the nose is presumably dedicated to smelling evolutionarily-relevant smells, most of which are "smells bad, avoid this". The method is very crude right now, but maybe with more fine-grained targetting we could better tune the smell profile.
I wonder if we search for the worst smell, via optimization, is does this make it a big, not very steep optimum? Or maybe all unknown smells are a little bad, but the worst smell is some familiar badness.
If they achieve their goals; I don't know of any tech company I would trust with a direct write access to my brain.
You literally give them write access to your brain every time you interact with social media.
Those few smells of extremes (garbage /clean air) make me think they are saturating the sensors.
I predict a future where once again porn is the cutting edge with a cutting edge technology.

porn + vr + smell

I want it the other way - I want google "search this smell" feature..
Reminds me of the vibration theory of olfaction.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vibration_theory_of_olfaction

Woah I didn't know about that theory, that's really interesting! If I understand correctly, it's that the ligand needs to both fit "physically" and also have the right vibrational mode to have high binding affinity / trigger the receptor? Sounds like the relevant frequencies would be in IR range, or roughly 10-100 terahertz. We're at 300 kHz, so 9 orders of magnitude lower, so we're likely not activating the receptors directly with that mechanism. But, maybe the acoustic radiation force from the ultrasound gives existing molecules in the air enough energy to increase the coupling? And nobody seems to really know how ultrasound neurostimulation really works, so who knows—maybe something similar even happens with neurotransmitters in cortex...
Kickstarter incoming for a device that induces code smells in sync with review.
Imagine how big of a stink the linter would put up as you worked on your most recent codebase!
Finally some progress towards smellovision.
Not joking, my mom has asked me every year since I became a "tech person" when I am going to make smellovision. This is perfect for her.
I am still waiting for the Smell Blaster.
Smells really get embedded into your conscience from early days. I remember as a kid really loving the "Smell-O-Vision" movie they had set up at La Cité des Sciences et de l’Industrie in Paris. As you watched they had little aerosol cans labeled with different scents ("baking bread" etc) that a mechanism would squirt towards the viewer.

I found this History of Smell-O-Vision paper too today:

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7691926/

What about all the other senses?
Lev also found vestibular! Email or dm him on twitter :)
The year is 2032. My smart fridge started A/B testing scents to reduce snacking. I ate a carrot and felt promoted.
A properly bizarre and interesting blogpost. Wow.
I find it incredible that the same olfactory activation patterns mapped to the the SAME smells in both subjects.
Sorry it's unclear in the post, they weren't exactly the same! The numbers reported were on Lev, and we swept them around that range for me (Albert). But we didn't take down the exact values, so unfortunately I don't know how similar the maps were. iirc they were pretty different.
> Different focal spots corresponded to different smells, which we’ve replicated first-try on two people and validated with a blind trial.

So, N=2 and the people in question are co-authors. I'm not in this business, but isn't this too... early to publish?

Certainly! We didn't get a chance to test it on more people before we had to take it apart, but we thought the result was too cool to share. Would love to see other folks run with the idea!
> At the time, all of our headsets had a knife taped to the probe

is this like some second meaning or smth?

why is there a knife on the headset?

Ha, nope. We needed something to stabilize the probe and the plastic knife from lunch was within reach :)
This is so incredibly cool. Will a non-contact version be possible?
A scary concept... I think the hardest part would be coupling the ultrasound through the air. But there are probably solutions..
Can a machine detect smell? That bit is left unattainable.
Very cool, although I found the link to LLMs toward the end to be a little odd.
...is this safe?
This is absolutely my question as well - curious if it's legal to do this, I'm guessing yes as it's an existing ultrasound device? But is there possibility of permanent damage?

It's objectively cool, but very curious about the safety as well.

The adult videos industry must be already closely looking at this, and I wouldn't be surprised if they don't finance related research soon in the future, it will be VHS vs betamax all over again.
My prediction is that in the not-to-distant future, we’re all going to live indefinitely in simulations that optimized for human experience. To do this, AIs will “highjack” our nervous systems and feed generated worlds to use to experience. This kind of thing makes it seem like it’s pretty realistic.