HN Explorer

12 comments

[ 2.6 ms ] story [ 28.7 ms ] thread
47282847
Cool! Congrats! Awesome work.

Small typo: “observing predicatable changes“

sevg
I think you’re getting downvoted because you’re reporting the typo in an odd and likely unproductive place.

I’m not sure what you expect HN readers to do about the typo. There is a comment section on the blog itself :)

[deleted]
(comment deleted)
m00dy
hey guys, anyone believes Tor still can provide anonymity to users ? just trying to ask politely.
jstanley
This FUD comes up whenever Tor is mentioned on Hacker News. The answer is: let's say you think Tor isn't 100% flawless. What are you going to do? Not use Tor? It's better than any other option.
bigyabai
It's not FUD at all. I think you would be utterly shocked how many active alternatives exist, and how small Tor is compared to it's reputation.
ongy
Low stakes (IP violations etc.): absolutely

High stakes (military / nation state scale): no

amelius
> Of course, we need to make sure that the data isn't modified on the way from the client.

Why is this necessary if every layer of the onion is a trustable encrypted link?