JD Vance responded to a lawsuit about the new $100,000 H1B visa fee imposed by the Trump administration with a condescending, aggressive reply on Twitter. It’s surprising to see this because JD Vance has been positioned as the tech industry / tech billionaire’s candidate. With immigrants founding half the Fortune 500 and leading many large companies and innovating in AI (like the attention paper), it seems like a huge mistake to encourage isolationist America First ideology. Worse, anti immigrant rhetoric is now encouraging racism and supremacist ideology in the mainstream. I wonder if JD Vance will regret this movement given he has a mixed race family.
I imagine blocking new immigrant talent favors existing mega corps, because it avoids founding any new Google or a similar competitive startup. While the corp is able to sacrifice a 20-day salary for a dedicated new bright employee. Or subtract the sum from his future salary.
If you really want to hire the "best and brightest" it should be worth paying the 100K fee to bring that 'talent' into the US if that equivalent skill can't be found in the US.
Instead these companies will just layoff Americans and relocate their tech offices in the one country (India) that takes up more than 75% of the H1B pool. (I wonder why?)
Is the 75% of that pool really the most elite "best and brightest" such that it warrants not hiring a US citizen? Or is the true reason that the purchasing power of a US employee is far higher than a H1B from India as long as they're cheap and can be overworked since rebelling means deportation which you can't do to a US citizen?
Those preaching "best and brightest" were also the same ones offshoring their critical technologies and secrets overseas to the low quality engineers just to cuts costs. What it actually does it causes billion dollar problems.
I didn't think there's a surplus of doctors, nurses and other medical professionals in the US (or any country). Partially due to the expense of training and partially due to resistance from the (self-)licensing organization unwilling to kill their future income. I'm also not sure there's a surplus of PhD's in the chemistry or biology areas to feed places like biotech, pharm, academia and related startups. To satisfy such positions, people are looking at 12 + 5 + 2 post HS education.
And then there's the scut work nobody seems to want to do - somebody has to pick in the fields, shred those chickens, ... And Connor and Maddie never seem to be interested in jobs at this level.
Will the governments step in to prevent companies from offshoring? Will people pay more at Walmart?
8 comments
[ 5.2 ms ] story [ 24.7 ms ] threadInstead these companies will just layoff Americans and relocate their tech offices in the one country (India) that takes up more than 75% of the H1B pool. (I wonder why?)
Is the 75% of that pool really the most elite "best and brightest" such that it warrants not hiring a US citizen? Or is the true reason that the purchasing power of a US employee is far higher than a H1B from India as long as they're cheap and can be overworked since rebelling means deportation which you can't do to a US citizen?
Those preaching "best and brightest" were also the same ones offshoring their critical technologies and secrets overseas to the low quality engineers just to cuts costs. What it actually does it causes billion dollar problems.
And then there's the scut work nobody seems to want to do - somebody has to pick in the fields, shred those chickens, ... And Connor and Maddie never seem to be interested in jobs at this level.
Will the governments step in to prevent companies from offshoring? Will people pay more at Walmart?