7 comments

[ 3.2 ms ] story [ 22.2 ms ] thread
I'd like to see an examination of how the phrase 'human slop' rose and fell in this year. Initially emerging as a counterpoint, it's now receded.
I've noticed amoung colleagues who are not fond of ai usage they love to call out "slop". If a line of code is too verbose or too succinct it must be ai. If a routine doesn't use the function they created when it's something tangentially related it must be ai slop. It's like the new form of gatekeeping.
This one is an apt pick. I only worry it’s early and the true wave of slop is not yet upon us.
I was thinking "upended," but "slop" is also a fine choice.