13 comments

[ 2.7 ms ] story [ 38.5 ms ] thread
If there wasn't an ongoing de facto recession, I would wager that the overvaluation of companies _would_ be at or near dot-com bubble levels. These AI companies have plenty of venture capital, but consumers are probably not as influential as they were back then. I agree we likely won't see a dotcom-like crash, but there will still be fallout that will take months to settle.
I sincerely hope this would kill Oracle with their karma
This can't happen soon enough. AI is a vacuum sucking up a lot of capital and attention that could and should be put to much much better uses
I tried figuring out how to bet on the AI bubble popping since the circle investments - that's by the way the one thing the article does not explain.

Can someone from the dear HN financially savvy users clarify what kinds of specific bets could be placed to that avail?

Generally it's not enough to know that something is a bubble; to bet against it you kind of need to know _when_ it collapses. For every Michael Burry there are a lot of investors who correctly identified that things were broken, but were sufficiently off on the timing that they made a loss on their bets anyway.

Now, granted, personally if I had, say, a lot of Oracle stock, I'd probably be getting rid of that. But unless you conveniently already have a bunch of bubble stock, there's not really a remotely safe way to play.

(comment deleted)
What is missing from the picture with all these articles is the numbers. LLMs already have a few solid use cases as translators, general document processors, coding helpers ...etc. So the first question is, to what extent does this demand support the investment? Would it be enough if basically every SP500 corp provided paid LLM access to their employees? Or is the investment so big, that people are betting on less solid applications, like Agentic AI, with some non-trivial automation?
Listened to Tom Lee on a Prof G Podcast and he made a lot of sense about it all.

https://youtu.be/2J_IGuA-IdY?si=uTptx9R-HMhjD9LH&t=1200

Worth listening to the entire podcast but this is a snip where he speaks about AI valuations. Somewhere in that podcast he brings up the fact that Costco is trading at double future earnings to NVIDIA, let that sink in.....

I'm thinking that the bubble will be the vortex caused by an abundance of power that becomes freely available locally due to the AI datacenters moving to space.
Never take Wall Street at their word. They just want to take profit and buy back cheaply. It's not the bubble they're inventing; it's the pop.